E Johansson1, N H Long, V K Diwan, A Winkvist. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. eva.johansson@phs.ki.se
Abstract
SETTING: A study carried out in 1996 in four districts representing south and north as well as urban and rural areas of Vietnam. OBJECTIVE: To explore gender differences in knowledge, beliefs and attitudes towards tuberculosis and its treatment, and how these factors influence patients' compliance with treatment. DESIGN: Sixteen focus group discussions were performed by a multi-disciplinary research team from Vietnam and Sweden. Analysis was performed using modified Grounded Theory technique, specifically evaluating gender differences. RESULTS: Women were believed to be more compliant than men. Insufficient knowledge and individual cost during treatment were reported as main obstacles to compliance among men (poor patient compliance), while sensitivity to interaction with health staff and stigma in society (poor health staff and system compliance) were reported as the main obstacles among women. CONCLUSIONS: It is time to adopt a more comprehensive and gender-sensitive approach to compliance, which incorporates patient compliance, doctor compliance and system compliance, in order to fully support individual patients in their efforts to comply with treatment.
SETTING: A study carried out in 1996 in four districts representing south and north as well as urban and rural areas of Vietnam. OBJECTIVE: To explore gender differences in knowledge, beliefs and attitudes towards tuberculosis and its treatment, and how these factors influence patients' compliance with treatment. DESIGN: Sixteen focus group discussions were performed by a multi-disciplinary research team from Vietnam and Sweden. Analysis was performed using modified Grounded Theory technique, specifically evaluating gender differences. RESULTS:Women were believed to be more compliant than men. Insufficient knowledge and individual cost during treatment were reported as main obstacles to compliance among men (poor patient compliance), while sensitivity to interaction with health staff and stigma in society (poor health staff and system compliance) were reported as the main obstacles among women. CONCLUSIONS: It is time to adopt a more comprehensive and gender-sensitive approach to compliance, which incorporates patient compliance, doctor compliance and system compliance, in order to fully support individual patients in their efforts to comply with treatment.
Authors: A M Kipp; P Pungrassami; P W Stewart; V Chongsuvivatwong; R P Strauss; A Van Rie Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Carolyn M Ford; Angela M Bayer; Robert H Gilman; Dami Onifade; Colleen Acosta; Lilia Cabrera; Carlos Vidal; Carlton A Evans Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Anna L Lohiniva; Alaa Mokhtar; Ashraf Azer; Esaam Elmoghazy; Eman Kamal; Manal Benkirane; Erica Dueger Journal: Health Soc Care Community Date: 2015-10-01
Authors: Dami A Onifade; Angela M Bayer; Rosario Montoya; Marie Haro; Jessica Alva; Jessica Franco; Rosario Sosa; Betty Valiente; Enit Valera; Carolyn M Ford; Colleen D Acosta; Carlton A Evans Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Gabriel Roman; Rodica Gramma; Angela Enache; Andrada Pârvu; Ştefana Maria Moisa; Silvia Dumitraş; Beatrice Ioan Journal: Med Health Care Philos Date: 2013-11