Literature DB >> 10524477

Effects of gender and acute dental pain on thermal pain responses.

R R Edwards1, R B Fillingim, S Yamauchi, A Sigurdsson, S Bunting, S G Mohorn, W Maixner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Considerable research suggests that females exhibit greater sensitivity to laboratory pain procedures than do males; however, whether the presence of acute clinical pain influences this sex difference in pain sensitivity has not been investigated. The present experiment investigated the effects of sex and acute dental pain on laboratory pain responses.
DESIGN: Thermal pain onset and tolerance were determined in 46 dental patients (15 male, 31 female) experiencing pain due to acute irreversible pulpitis and in 33 healthy controls (13 male, 20 female). In addition, measures of mood and coping were obtained in all participants. All subjects participated in two experimental sessions. The first session took place immediately before the patients underwent endodontic treatment for relief of pulpal pain. The second session took place approximately 1-2 weeks later, when pulpitis patients were pain free after treatment. During each session, thermal pain onset and tolerance were assessed with a 1-cm2 contact thermode applied to the right volar forearm using an ascending method of limits.
RESULTS: During both sessions, thermal pain onset and tolerance were lower in control females than in control males; however, male and female pulpitis patients did not differ in their thermal pain responses during either session. Pulpitis patients also showed greater affective distress than controls.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the sex difference in thermal pain sensitivity frequently reported in pain-free subjects appears to be absent in patients presenting with acute dental pain. However, this effect cannot be explained solely based on the presence of clinical pain because the effect on pain threshold and tolerance persisted into session 2, when pulpitis patients were pain free. Potential explanations for these results are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10524477     DOI: 10.1097/00002508-199909000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  4 in total

1.  Orofacial pain prospective evaluation and risk assessment study--the OPPERA study.

Authors:  William Maixner; Luda Diatchenko; Ronald Dubner; Roger B Fillingim; Joel D Greenspan; Charles Knott; Richard Ohrbach; Bruce Weir; Gary D Slade
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Blockade of opioid receptors in the medullary reticularis nucleus dorsalis, but not the rostral ventromedial medulla, prevents analgesia produced by diffuse noxious inhibitory control in rats with muscle inflammation.

Authors:  Marcos A de Resende; Luis Felipe S Silva; Karina Sato; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Pulp sensibility tests responses in patients with anxiety and depression.

Authors:  Narges Farhad-Mollashahi; Mahboubeh-Firouzkouhi Moghadam; Seyed-Mohammad-Javad Aslani; Forugh Mollashahi
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-05-01

4.  When race matters: disagreement in pain perception between patients and their physicians in primary care.

Authors:  Lisa J Staton; Mukta Panda; Ian Chen; Inginia Genao; James Kurz; Mark Pasanen; Alex J Mechaber; Madhusudan Menon; Jane O'Rorke; JoAnn Wood; Eric Rosenberg; Charles Faeslis; Tim Carey; Diane Calleson; Sam Cykert
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.798

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.