Literature DB >> 10524242

How many potentially secreted proteins are contained in a bacterial genome?

G Schneider1.   

Abstract

Artificial neural networks were trained on the prediction of the subcellular location of bacterial proteins. A cross-validated average prediction accuracy of 93% was reached for distinction between cytoplasmic and non-cytoplasmic proteins, based on the analysis of protein amino-acid composition. Principal component analysis and self-organizing maps were used to create graphical representations of amino-acid sequence space. A clear separation of cytoplasmic, periplasmic, and extracellular proteins was observed. The neural network system was applied to predicting potentially secreted proteins in 15 complete genomes. For mesophile bacteria the predicted fractions of non-cytoplasmic proteins agree with previously published estimates, ranging between 15% and 30%. Characteristics of thermophile genomes might lead to an under-estimation of the fraction of secreted proteins by presently available prediction systems. A self-organizing map was constructed from all 15 bacterial genomes. This technique can reveal additional sequence features independent from exhaustive pair-wise sequence alignment. The Treponema pallidum and Mycobacterium tuberculosis data formed separate clusters indicating unusual characteristics of these genomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10524242     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00310-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  10 in total

1.  Comparing function and structure between entire proteomes.

Authors:  J Liu; B Rost
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Archaeal signal peptides--a comparative survey at the genome level.

Authors:  Sonia L Bardy; Jerry Eichler; Ken F Jarrell
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  Protein export systems of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: novel targets for drug development?

Authors:  Meghan E Feltcher; Jonathan Tabb Sullivan; Miriam Braunstein
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.165

4.  Self-organizing maps: a tool to ascertain taxonomic relatedness based on features derived from 16S rDNA sequence.

Authors:  D V Raje; H J Purohit; Y P Badhe; S S Tambe; B D Kulkarni
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Pericellular proteins of the developing mouse tendon: a proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Simone M Smith; Charles E Thomas; David E Birk
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.417

6.  Comparative genomics using data mining tools.

Authors:  Tannistha Nandi; Chandrika B-Rao; Srinivasan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Economical evolution: microbes reduce the synthetic cost of extracellular proteins.

Authors:  Daniel R Smith; Matthew R Chapman
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 7.867

8.  SPAAN: a software program for prediction of adhesins and adhesin-like proteins using neural networks.

Authors:  Gaurav Sachdeva; Kaushal Kumar; Preti Jain; Srinivasan Ramachandran
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Non-classical protein secretion in bacteria.

Authors:  Jannick D Bendtsen; Lars Kiemer; Anders Fausbøll; Søren Brunak
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  The Plasmodium export element revisited.

Authors:  Jan Alexander Hiss; Jude Marek Przyborski; Florian Schwarte; Klaus Lingelbach; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.