Literature DB >> 10523748

Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials: an application to the ATBC Study.

P A Korhonen1, N M Laird, J Palmgren.   

Abstract

Different methods for estimating the effect of treatment actually received in a longitudinal placebo-controlled trial with non-compliance are discussed. Total mortality from the ATBC Study is used as an illustrative example. In the ATBC Study some 25 per cent of the participants dropped out from active follow-up prior to the scheduled end of the study. The 'intention-to-treat' analysis showed an increased death risk in the beta-carotene arm when compared with the no beta-carotene arm. Owing to considerable non-compliance it is also of interest to estimate the effect of beta-carotene actually received. We use a simple model for the treatment action and discuss three methods for estimation of the treatment effect under the model - the 'intention-to-treat' approach, the 'as-treated' approach and the g-estimation approach. These approaches are compared in a simulation study under different settings for non-compliance. Finally, the data from the ATBC Study are analysed using the proposed methods. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10523748     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19991115)18:21<2879::aid-sim190>3.0.co;2-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  7 in total

1.  Healthy worker survivor bias in the Colorado Plateau uranium miners cohort.

Authors:  Alexander P Keil; David B Richardson; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Longitudinal Analysis when the Experimenter does not Determine when Treatment Ends: What is Dose-Response?

Authors:  Daniel J Feaster; Frederick L Newman; Christopher Rice
Journal:  Clin Psychol Psychother       Date:  2003

3.  Estimating absolute risks in the presence of nonadherence: an application to a follow-up study with baseline randomization.

Authors:  Sengwee Toh; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Roger Logan; James M Robins; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Improving data reliability using a non-compliance detection method versus using pharmacokinetic criteria.

Authors:  Smita A Kshirsagar; Terrence F Blaschke; Lewis B Sheiner; M Krygowski; Edward P Acosta; Davide Verotta
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  A method to estimate treatment efficacy among latent subgroups of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Lily L Altstein; Gang Li; Robert M Elashoff
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Estimating the Effect of School Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Improvements on Pupil Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua V Garn; Babette A Brumback; Carolyn D Drews-Botsch; Timothy L Lash; Michael R Kramer; Matthew C Freeman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Statistical Methods for Adjusting Estimates of Treatment Effectiveness for Patient Nonadherence in the Context of Time-to-Event Outcomes and Health Technology Assessment: A Systematic Review of Methodological Papers.

Authors:  Abualbishr Alshreef; Nicholas Latimer; Paul Tappenden; Ruth Wong; Dyfrig Hughes; James Fotheringham; Simon Dixon
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.583

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.