Literature DB >> 10523744

Measurement error in epidemiology: the design of validation studies I: univariate situation.

M Y Wong1, N E Day, S A Bashir, S W Duffy.   

Abstract

It is becoming standard practice in epidemiology to adjust relative risk estimates to remove the bias caused by non-differential errors in the exposure measurement. Estimation of the correction factor is often based on a validation study incorporating repeated measures of exposure, which are assumed to be independent. This assumption is difficult to verify and often likely to be false. We examine the effect of departures from this assumption on the correction factor estimate, and explore the design of validation studies using two or even three different types of measurement of exposure, where assumption of independence between the measures may be more realistic. The value of good biomarker measures of exposure is demonstrated even if they are feasible to use only in a validation study. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10523744     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19991115)18:21<2815::aid-sim280>3.0.co;2-#

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

1.  Two-Phase Sampling Designs for Data Validation in Settings with Covariate Measurement Error and Continuous Outcome.

Authors:  Gustavo Amorim; Ran Tao; Sarah Lotspeich; Pamela A Shaw; Thomas Lumley; Bryan E Shepherd
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.175

2.  Dying to count: mortality surveillance in resource-poor settings.

Authors:  Edward Fottrell
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 2.640

3.  Correcting for multivariate measurement error by regression calibration in meta-analyses of epidemiological studies.

Authors: 
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Adverse experience in childhood as a developmental risk factor for altered immune status in adulthood.

Authors:  Paul Surtees; Nicholas Wainwright; Nicholas Day; Carol Brayne; Robert Luben; Kay-Tee Khaw
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2003

5.  The impact of imprecisely measured covariates on estimating gene-environment interactions.

Authors:  Darren C Greenwood; Mark S Gilthorpe; Janet E Cade
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 6.  Systematic review of statistical approaches to quantify, or correct for, measurement error in a continuous exposure in nutritional epidemiology.

Authors:  Derrick A Bennett; Denise Landry; Julian Little; Cosetta Minelli
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Demonstrating the robustness of population surveillance data: implications of error rates on demographic and mortality estimates.

Authors:  Edward Fottrell; Peter Byass; Yemane Berhane
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  The temporal reliability of serum estrogens, progesterone, gonadotropins, SHBG and urinary estrogen and progesterone metabolites in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Andrew E Williams; Gertraud Maskarinec; Adrian A Franke; Frank Z Stanczyk
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2002-12-23       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Using surrogate biomarkers to improve measurement error models in nutritional epidemiology.

Authors:  Ruth H Keogh; Ian R White; Sheila A Rodwell
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.373

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.