Literature DB >> 10523310

Resolution of head-on collisions between the transcription machinery and bacteriophage phi29 DNA polymerase is dependent on RNA polymerase translocation.

M Elías-Arnanz1, M Salas.   

Abstract

The outcome of collisions between Bacillus subtilis phage Phi29 DNA polymerase and oppositely oriented transcription complexes has been studied in vitro. We found that the replication fork was unable to go past a transcription ternary complex stalled head-on. However, head-on collisions did not lead to a deadlock. Both DNA and RNA polymerase remained bound to the template and, when the halted transcription complex was allowed to move, the replication machinery resumed normal elongation. These results suggested that a replication fork that encounters an RNA polymerase head-on whose movement is not impeded would bypass the transcription machinery. Our results for head-on collisions between concurrently moving replication and transcription complexes are indeed consistent with the existence of a resolving mechanism. The ability of Phi29 DNA polymerase to resolve head-on collisions with itself during symmetrical replication of Phi29 DNA in vivo is likely to be related to its ability to pass a head-on oriented RNA polymerase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10523310      PMCID: PMC1171634          DOI: 10.1093/emboj/18.20.5675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  16 in total

1.  RNA polymerases from Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli differ in recognition of regulatory signals in vitro.

Authors:  I Artsimovitch; V Svetlov; L Anthony; R R Burgess; R Landick
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Mechanisms of transcription-replication collisions in bacteria.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Mirkin; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Impairment of replication fork progression mediates RNA polII transcription-associated recombination.

Authors:  Félix Prado; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Transcription regulatory elements are punctuation marks for DNA replication.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Mirkin; Daniel Castro Roa; Evgeny Nudler; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A mechanism of nucleotide misincorporation during transcription due to template-strand misalignment.

Authors:  Richard T Pomerantz; Dmitry Temiakov; Michael Anikin; Dmitry G Vassylyev; William T McAllister
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Genome-wide coorientation of replication and transcription reduces adverse effects on replication in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Jue D Wang; Melanie B Berkmen; Alan D Grossman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Replication fork stalling at natural impediments.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Mirkin; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 11.056

8.  The transcription factor DksA prevents conflicts between DNA replication and transcription machinery.

Authors:  Ashley K Tehranchi; Matthew D Blankschien; Yan Zhang; Jennifer A Halliday; Anjana Srivatsan; Jia Peng; Christophe Herman; Jue D Wang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  CarD: a new RNA polymerase modulator in mycobacteria.

Authors:  Christina L Stallings; Michael S Glickman
Journal:  Transcription       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

Review 10.  Molecular traffic jams on DNA.

Authors:  Ilya J Finkelstein; Eric C Greene
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 12.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.