OBJECTIVES: To describe how removing physical restraints affected injuries in nursing home settings. DESIGN: A 2-year prospective study of an educational intervention for physical restraint reduction. SETTING: Sixteen diverse nursing homes with 2075 beds in California, Michigan, New York, and North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: Study A: 859 residents who were physically restrained at the onset of the intervention on October 1, 1991. Study B: all residents who occupied the 2075 beds in the 16 facilities 3 months before the intervention and 3 months after its completion. INTERVENTION: Educational program for nursing home staff followed by quarterly site consultations to participating nursing homes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of physical restraint use and injuries. RESULTS: Study A: Serious injuries declined significantly among the 859 residents restrained initially when restraint orders were discontinued (X2 = 6.2, P = .013). Study B: During the intervention period, physical restraint use among the 2075 residents decreased from 41% to 4%, a 90% reduction. The decrease in the percentage of injuries of moderate to serious severity was significant (i.e., 7.5% vs 4.4%, P2-tail = .0004) as was the rate of moderate and serious injuries combined (Rate Ratio = 1.580, P2-tail = .0033). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial decrease in restraint use occurred without an increase in serious injuries. Although minor injuries and falls increased, restraint-free care is safe when a comprehensive assessment is done and restraint alternatives are used.
OBJECTIVES: To describe how removing physical restraints affected injuries in nursing home settings. DESIGN: A 2-year prospective study of an educational intervention for physical restraint reduction. SETTING: Sixteen diverse nursing homes with 2075 beds in California, Michigan, New York, and North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: Study A: 859 residents who were physically restrained at the onset of the intervention on October 1, 1991. Study B: all residents who occupied the 2075 beds in the 16 facilities 3 months before the intervention and 3 months after its completion. INTERVENTION: Educational program for nursing home staff followed by quarterly site consultations to participating nursing homes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of physical restraint use and injuries. RESULTS: Study A: Serious injuries declined significantly among the 859 residents restrained initially when restraint orders were discontinued (X2 = 6.2, P = .013). Study B: During the intervention period, physical restraint use among the 2075 residents decreased from 41% to 4%, a 90% reduction. The decrease in the percentage of injuries of moderate to serious severity was significant (i.e., 7.5% vs 4.4%, P2-tail = .0004) as was the rate of moderate and serious injuries combined (Rate Ratio = 1.580, P2-tail = .0033). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial decrease in restraint use occurred without an increase in serious injuries. Although minor injuries and falls increased, restraint-free care is safe when a comprehensive assessment is done and restraint alternatives are used.
Entities:
Keywords:
Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship
Authors: P Koczy; T Klie; M Kron; D Bredthauer; U Rissmann; S Branitzki; V Guerra; A Klein; T Pfundstein; Th Nikolaus; S Sander; C Becker Journal: Z Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 1.281
Authors: Howard B Degenholtz; Rosalie A Kane; Robert L Kane; Boris Bershadsky; Kristen C Kling Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Marilyn J Rantz; Mary Zwygart-Stauffacher; Lanis Hicks; David Mehr; Marcia Flesner; Gregory F Petroski; Richard W Madsen; Jill Scott-Cawiezell Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Math J M Gulpers; Michel H C Bleijlevens; Erik van Rossum; Elizabeth Capezuti; Jan P H Hamers Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2010-02-25 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Zhanlian Feng; John P Hirdes; Trevor F Smith; Harriet Finne-Soveri; Iris Chi; Jean-Noel Du Pasquier; Ruedi Gilgen; Naoki Ikegami; Vincent Mor Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.485