| Literature DB >> 10522280 |
L C Mâsse1, J E Fulton, K L Watson, K C Heesch, H W Kohl, S N Blair, S R Tortolero.
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to assess the TRITRAC and CSA for: (a) interaccelerometer agreement; (b) agreement in detecting patterns of moderate-intensity physical activity; and (c) agreement in detecting walking patterns recorded in a diary. Thirty-one women wore both the TRITRAC and CSA accelerometers for three consecutive days. Interaccelerometer agreement (measured with generalizability coefficients) ranged from .88 to .99. In total, 71.3% of the accelerometers' patterns agreed in length, with CSA patterns being on average significantly longer. Interaccelerometer agreement in detecting patterns of brisk walking, as recorded in a diary, was comparable (69.4%). Interaccelerometer discrepancies may be related in part to the threshold employed by each instrument for classifying moderate intensity patterns.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1999 PMID: 10522280 DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1999.10608041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Res Q Exerc Sport ISSN: 0270-1367 Impact factor: 2.500