Literature DB >> 10522192

Cytocompatibility of periodontal dressing materials in fibroblast and primary human osteoblast-like cultures.

B Alpar1, H Günay, W Geurtsen, G Leyhausen.   

Abstract

Purpose of this investigation was to determine the cytocompatibility of various periodontal dressing materials by means of human primary gingival fibroblasts (HGF), human osteoblast-like cells (HObl) derived from the alveolar bone, and permanent 3T3 mouse fibroblasts (3T3). Cell culture medium extracts (time periods of extraction: day 1 and between day 2 and day 8 after setting) as well as solid specimens of the following materials were investigated: Coe-pak, Voco pac, Peripac, and Barricaid. Responses of cultures exposed for 24 h and 48 h to these materials were monitored by the fluorescent dyes H33342 and sulforhodamin 101 as well as by light microscopy. It was found that most extracts of Voco pac, Peripac, and Barricaid did not inhibit growth of HGF. Coe-Pak, however, clearly reduced the proliferation of HGF compared to untreated controls. Peripac decreased growth of HObl whereas Coe-Pak, Voco pac, and Barricaid caused no cytotoxic alterations in any of the test assays. Contrary to HGF and HObl, 3T3 cells were much more irritated by the test materials. But the light-curing resinous material Barricaid reduced proliferation of 3T3-fibroblasts only slightly. Our data indicate that Barricaid is exceedingly cytocompatible, whereas all other materials revealed moderate or severe cytotoxic effects according to the cell type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10522192     DOI: 10.1007/s007840050077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  6 in total

1.  Use of a light cured periodontal surgical dressing material in temporization: A convenient approach.

Authors:  W Bruce Lee Singh; Saumyendra V Singh; W Pragya Pandey; Nehal Solanki
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-04-09

2.  In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings.

Authors:  Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Zahra Baghani; Maryam Torshabi; Bahar Basirat
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2017-03-31

3.  Evaluation of tissue response to periodontal dressings: histological study in tooth sockets of rats.

Authors:  Célia Tomiko Matida Hamata Saito; Pedro Felício Estrada Bernabé; Tetuo Okamoto; Sueli Satomi Murata; Marcelo Matida Hamata; Maria Lúcia Marçal Mazza Sundefeld
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Light-cured resin "Barricaid" - An aesthetic and biocompatible dressing: A step ahead.

Authors:  Ellora Madan; Vipin Bharti; K K Chaubey; Vipin K R Arora; Rajesh K Thakur; Anubha Nirwal
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2013-11

5.  Periodontal dressing: a review article.

Authors:  Zahra Baghani; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2013-12-18

6.  Gingival Tissue Response Following Placement of a Light Cure Dressing and a Non-eugenol Dressing after Periodontal Flap Procedure: A Comparative Clinical Study.

Authors:  Ankita Kakar; Arundeep Kaur Lamba; Shruti Tandon; Farrukh Faraz; Abdul Ahad
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.