BACKGROUND: We compared abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) prevalence in 3 groups of patients at the Hines Veterans Affairs Medical Center: (1) patients with 50% or more carotid stenosis, (2) patients with less than 50% stenosis, and (3) patients screened for the Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) study. METHODS: Of all the patients referred to the vascular laboratory for carotid duplex examination during a 12-month period, patients with 50% or more carotid stenosis underwent ultrasonography of the abdominal aorta unless they had a previous scan or previous aortic surgery (group 1, n = 374). Patients with less than 50% carotid stenosis who had been screened for ADAM comprised group 2 (n = 139). They were compared with all patients screened for ADAM at our center during the same time period (group 3, n = 2477). RESULTS: AAA of 3.0 cm or more were present in 18.2%, 12.2%, and 7.2% of groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; AAA of 4.0 cm or more were present in 8.3%, 5.8%, and 2.1% of groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Among patients with carotid stenosis, those patients without diabetes accounted for the observed increase in prevalence (21.9 % > or = 3.0 cm and 10.2% > or = 4.0 cm vs 9.2% and 2.8% in patients with diabetes). CONCLUSIONS: The relative risk of AAA is 2 to 3 times greater in patients with carotid stenosis compared with patients undergoing routine screening. However, only patients without diabetes account for the increased prevalence. Selective AAA screening of patients who are not diabetic with carotid stenosis is recommended.
BACKGROUND: We compared abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) prevalence in 3 groups of patients at the Hines Veterans Affairs Medical Center: (1) patients with 50% or more carotid stenosis, (2) patients with less than 50% stenosis, and (3) patients screened for the Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) study. METHODS: Of all the patients referred to the vascular laboratory for carotid duplex examination during a 12-month period, patients with 50% or more carotid stenosis underwent ultrasonography of the abdominal aorta unless they had a previous scan or previous aortic surgery (group 1, n = 374). Patients with less than 50% carotid stenosis who had been screened for ADAM comprised group 2 (n = 139). They were compared with all patients screened for ADAM at our center during the same time period (group 3, n = 2477). RESULTS: AAA of 3.0 cm or more were present in 18.2%, 12.2%, and 7.2% of groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; AAA of 4.0 cm or more were present in 8.3%, 5.8%, and 2.1% of groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Among patients with carotid stenosis, those patients without diabetes accounted for the observed increase in prevalence (21.9 % > or = 3.0 cm and 10.2% > or = 4.0 cm vs 9.2% and 2.8% in patients with diabetes). CONCLUSIONS: The relative risk of AAA is 2 to 3 times greater in patients with carotid stenosis compared with patients undergoing routine screening. However, only patients without diabetes account for the increased prevalence. Selective AAA screening of patients who are not diabetic with carotid stenosis is recommended.
Authors: Darrell Wu; Pingping Ren; Yanqiu Zheng; Lin Zhang; Gaiping Xu; Wanmu Xie; Eric E Lloyd; Sui Zhang; Qianzi Zhang; John A Curci; Joseph S Coselli; Dianna M Milewicz; Ying H Shen; Scott A LeMaire Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: L Esposito; T Saam; P Heider; Angelina Bockelbrink; Jaroslav Pelisek; D Sepp; R Feurer; C Winkler; T Liebig; K Holzer; O Pauly; S Sadikovic; B Hemmer; H Poppert Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 1.930