Literature DB >> 10520619

Are the federal and state governments complying with the Synar Amendment?

J R DiFranza1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1992, Congress enacted the Synar Amendment, requiring states and territories to enact a law prohibiting the sale of tobacco to minors and to enforce that law in a manner that could reasonably be expected to decrease the availability of tobacco to minors. The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) was mandated to withhold block grant funding from noncompliant states.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if DHHS and applicant states and territories are complying with the Synar Amendment. DATA SOURCES: Fiscal year 1997 substance abuse block grant applications from 59 states and territories. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether applicants had enacted a tobacco sales law, conducted enforcement inspections, penalized violators, and conducted a statewide survey, and whether DHHS regulations and actions were consistent with the statutory requirements of the Synar Amendment.
RESULTS: Two applicants failed to enact appropriate laws, 15 failed to conduct enforcement inspections, 18 failed to provide a single example of a violator being penalized, and 1 failed to conduct a survey. Nineteen applicants failed to meet the statutory requirements, but none were sanctioned by DHHS as required by the Synar Amendment. The DHHS regulations, as implemented, do not require states to enforce their laws or to achieve illegal tobacco sales rates low enough to reduce the availability of tobacco to minors.
CONCLUSIONS: The states and DHHS are violating the statutory requirements of the Synar Amendment, rendering it ineffective. Few states have implemented effective enforcement programs, and national surveys confirm that there has been no measurable reduction in the availability of tobacco to youths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10520619     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.153.10.1089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  7 in total

1.  Cigarette acquisition and proof of age among US high school students who smoke.

Authors:  S Everett Jones; D J Sharp; C G Husten; L S Crossett
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Is the standard compliance check protocol a valid measure of the accessibility of tobacco to underage smokers?

Authors:  J R DiFranza; J A Savageau; J Bouchard
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Relation between access to tobacco and adolescent smoking.

Authors:  C Dent; A Biglan
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  The impact of local U.S. tobacco policies on youth tobacco use: A critical review.

Authors:  Karen B Friend; Sharon Lipperman-Kreda; Joel W Grube
Journal:  Open J Prev Med       Date:  2011

5.  The federal initiative to halt the sale of tobacco to children--the Synar Amendment, 1992-2000: lessons learned.

Authors:  J R DiFranza; G F Dussault
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  A systematic review of interventions for preventing tobacco sales to minors.

Authors:  L F Stead; T Lancaster
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Tobacco Institute lobbying at the state and local levels of government in the 1990s.

Authors:  C P Morley; K M Cummings; A Hyland; G A Giovino; J K Horan
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.