Literature DB >> 10518785

Studies of the Escherichia coli Trp repressor binding to its five operators and to variant operator sequences.

M Jeeves1, P D Evans, R A Parslow, M Jaseja, E I Hyde.   

Abstract

The Escherichia coli Trp repressor binds to promoters of very different sequence and intrinsic activity. Its mode of binding to trp operator DNA has been studied extensively yet remains highly controversial. In order to examine the selectivity of the protein for DNA, we have used electromobility shift assays (EMSAs) to study its binding to synthetic DNA containing the core sequences of each of its five operators and of operator variants. Our results for DNA containing sequences of two of the operators, trpEDCBA and aroH are similar to those of previous studies. Up to three bands of lower mobility than the free DNA are obtained which are assigned to complexes of stoichiometry 1 : 1, 2 : 1 and 3 : 1 Trp repressor dimer to DNA. The mtr and aroL operators have not been studied previously in vitro. For DNA containing these sequences, we observe predominantly one retarded band in EMSA with mobility corresponding to 2 : 1 complexes. We have also obtained retardation of DNA containing the trpR operator sequence, which has only been previously obtained with super-repressor Trp mutants. This gives bands with mobilities corresponding to 1 : 1 and 2 : 1 complexes. In contrast, DNA containing containing a symmetrized trpR operator sequence, trpRs, gives a single retarded band with mobility corresponding solely to a 1 : 1 protein dimer-DNA complex. Using trpR operator variants, we show that a change in a single base pair in the core 20 base pairs can alter the number of retarded DNA bands in EMSA and the length of the DNase I footprint observed. This shows that the binding of the second dimer is sequence selective. We propose that the broad selectivity of Trp repressor coupled to tandem 2 : 1 binding, which we have observed with all five operator sequences, enables the Trp repressor to bind to a limited number of sites with diverse sequences. This allows it to co-ordinately control promoters of different intrinsic strength. This mechanism may be of importance in a number of promoters that bind multiple effector molecules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10518785     DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00792.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Biochem        ISSN: 0014-2956


  7 in total

1.  Surface plasmon resonance studies of wild-type and AV77 tryptophan repressor resolve ambiguities in super-repressor activity.

Authors:  Michael D Finucane; Oleg Jardetzky
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Bacillus subtilis CodY operators contain overlapping CodY binding sites.

Authors:  Lewis V Wray; Susan H Fisher
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Deciphering the transcriptional regulatory logic of amino acid metabolism.

Authors:  Byung-Kwan Cho; Stephen Federowicz; Young-Seoub Park; Karsten Zengler; Bernhard Ø Palsson
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 15.040

4.  Molecular mechanism of tryptophan-dependent transcriptional regulation in Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Johnny C Akers; Ming Tan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Transcriptional regulation by competing transcription factor modules.

Authors:  Rutger Hermsen; Sander Tans; Pieter Rein ten Wolde
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Comparative genomics and evolution of transcriptional regulons in Proteobacteria.

Authors:  Semen A Leyn; Inna A Suvorova; Alexey E Kazakov; Dmitry A Ravcheev; Vita V Stepanova; Pavel S Novichkov; Dmitry A Rodionov
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2016-07-11

7.  Lighting up yeast cell factories by transcription factor-based biosensors.

Authors:  Vasil D'Ambrosio; Michael K Jensen
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.