Literature DB >> 10518233

"Pop-out" method of levonorgestrel implant removal.

H C Pymar1, M D Creinin, J L Schwartz.   

Abstract

The "pop-out" technique is a method of levonorgestrel implant removal that uses digital pressure to direct implants through a small skin incision. This technique was developed, theoretically, to cause less bruising and patient discomfort by avoiding the use of instruments. The pop-out technique is the primary method used for levonorgestrel implant removal in the Magee-Womens Hospital resident clinic. We performed a retrospective analysis of levonorgestrel implant removals performed between July 1, 1995, and December 31, 1998. Of the 168 removals included in this analysis, 38 were performed by one of two attending physicians, and 130 were performed by the residents with attending supervision. The average time for removal was 12 +/- 5 min (range 2.25-27 min) when the "pop-out" method could be used to remove all six implants, and 14 +/- 7 min (range 2.25-59 min) for all removals. The removal time for residents was inversely proportional to the anticipated level of difficulty of the removal and to the number of previous removals performed. The removal time was significantly faster when residents were supervised by one of the attending physicians as compared with the other attending physician. Only 0.7% (7/1,008) of levonorgestrel implants were fragmented during removal. This review shows that the "pop-out" method is a reasonable alternative to other proposed methods of primary implant removal. The difference in the level of expertise of the attending physician may significantly influence removal time when training clinicians in levonorgestrel implant removal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin; Contraceptive Implants; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Removal; Developed Countries; Family Planning; Levonorgestrel; North America; Northern America; Pennsylvania; Research Methodology; Research Report; Retrospective Studies; Studies; Treatment; United States

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10518233     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00048-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  5 in total

Review 1.  Contraceptive Implant Migration and Removal by Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  Salina Zhang; Pelin Batur; Charles Martin; Paul J Rochon
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Difficult removal of subdermal contraceptive implants: a multidisciplinary approach involving a peripheral nerve expert.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Odom; David L Eisenberg; Ida K Fox
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Difficult etonogestrel implant removals in South Africa: A review of 74 referred cases.

Authors:  Gregory Petro; Trevi Spence; Malika Patel; Alida M Gertz; Chelsea Morroni
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance is effective, quick, and safe.

Authors:  Thibaut Jacques; Charlotte Brienne; Simon Henry; Hortense Baffet; Géraldine Giraudet; Xavier Demondion; Anne Cotten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 7.034

5.  Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the etonogestrel implantable contraceptive.

Authors:  Heather Hohmann
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.