D Gupta1, G Balsara. 1. Department of Pathology, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To further elucidate the cytologic manifestations of extrauterine malignancies, to evaluate their possible distinction from primary cervical malignancies and to analyze their clinical significance and role in staging. STUDY DESIGN: Papanicolaou (Pap) smears in 33 cases with abnormal cells originating in histologically proven extrauterine carcinomas were evaluated. These cases came from the files of the Medical College of Pennsylvania and Lankenau Hospitals. RESULTS: Ovary, gastrointestinal tract and breast were the three most frequent primary sites, accounting for 28 of the 33 cases (85%). The histologic types encountered were adenocarcinoma, 29 cases (88%); mucoepidermoid carcinoma, 1 (3%); small cell carcinoma, 1 (3%); cloacogenic carcinoma and large cell lymphoma, 1 (3%). The following diagnoses were rendered at the time of initial evaluation: adenocarcinoma consistent with metastasis, 21 cases; carcinoma, primary versus metastatic, 2; adenocarcinoma, suspicious for endometrial primary, 2; suspicious for carcinoma, 1; and atypical glandular cells, 7. CONCLUSION: The yield for positive Pap smear diagnoses in extrauterine malignancies is best in patients with an established diagnosis of a primary neoplasm. The degree of tumor differentiation and extent of tumor involvement did not appear to correlate with diagnostic yield. There appeared to be no statistically significant association of tumor diathesis with primary versus metastatic carcinoma and presence or absence of documented local involvement of the endometrium, cervix or vagina. Therefore, while Pap smears can serve as a diagnostic tool in the evaluation of extrauterine malignancies, they are best utilized as an adjunct to tumor staging and patient management.
OBJECTIVE: To further elucidate the cytologic manifestations of extrauterine malignancies, to evaluate their possible distinction from primary cervical malignancies and to analyze their clinical significance and role in staging. STUDY DESIGN: Papanicolaou (Pap) smears in 33 cases with abnormal cells originating in histologically proven extrauterine carcinomas were evaluated. These cases came from the files of the Medical College of Pennsylvania and Lankenau Hospitals. RESULTS: Ovary, gastrointestinal tract and breast were the three most frequent primary sites, accounting for 28 of the 33 cases (85%). The histologic types encountered were adenocarcinoma, 29 cases (88%); mucoepidermoid carcinoma, 1 (3%); small cell carcinoma, 1 (3%); cloacogenic carcinoma and large cell lymphoma, 1 (3%). The following diagnoses were rendered at the time of initial evaluation: adenocarcinoma consistent with metastasis, 21 cases; carcinoma, primary versus metastatic, 2; adenocarcinoma, suspicious for endometrial primary, 2; suspicious for carcinoma, 1; and atypical glandular cells, 7. CONCLUSION: The yield for positive Pap smear diagnoses in extrauterine malignancies is best in patients with an established diagnosis of a primary neoplasm. The degree of tumor differentiation and extent of tumor involvement did not appear to correlate with diagnostic yield. There appeared to be no statistically significant association of tumor diathesis with primary versus metastatic carcinoma and presence or absence of documented local involvement of the endometrium, cervix or vagina. Therefore, while Pap smears can serve as a diagnostic tool in the evaluation of extrauterine malignancies, they are best utilized as an adjunct to tumor staging and patient management.