Literature DB >> 10517562

Urinary excretion profiles of 11-nor-9-carboxy-delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol: a delta9-THCCOOH to creatinine ratio study.

A D Fraser1, D Worth.   

Abstract

Monitoring the major cannabinoid metabolite (delta9-THCCOOH) to creatinine ratio (M/C) has been used to predict new drug use. According to Huestis and Cone, the best accuracy (85.4%) for predicting new marijuana use was a ratio > or = 0.5 from two urine specimens collected at least 24 h apart. Manno et al. recommended an M/C ratio of > or = 1.5. Subjects with a history of chronic marijuana use were screened for cannabinoid use by immunoassay (50-ng/mL cutoff), and presumptive positives were confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for delta9-THCCOOH (15-ng/mL cutoff). Creatinine was analyzed with a cutoff concentration of 25 mg/dL. The study objective was to apply the criteria from both groups of workers to determine if consecutive urine specimens (collected at least 24 h apart) positive for cannabinoids could be used to differentiate new marijuana use from the excretion of residual cannabinoid metabolite (delta9-THCCOOH) in an uncontrolled setting. Serial urine specimens (826) were collected from 26 individuals. Huestis and Cone and Manno et al. ratios indicated new drug use in 83% and 33% of serial urine specimens collected at least 24 h apart, respectively. Clinically, the Huestis and Cone ratio is recommended because of a lower false-negative rate (7.4%) than the Manno et al. false-negative rate (24%). In legal situations, we recommend using the Manno et al. ratio because of its lower false-positive rate (0.1%) as stated by Huestis and Cone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10517562     DOI: 10.1093/jat/23.6.531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  4 in total

1.  Erratum To: Implementation of a Blind Quality Control Program in Blood Alcohol Analysis.

Authors:  Jackeline Moral; Callan Hundl; Dayong Lee; Maddisen Neuman; Aimee Grimaldi; Maria Cuellar; Peter Stout
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  A proof-of-concept randomized controlled study of gabapentin: effects on cannabis use, withdrawal and executive function deficits in cannabis-dependent adults.

Authors:  Barbara J Mason; Rebecca Crean; Vivian Goodell; John M Light; Susan Quello; Farhad Shadan; Kimberly Buffkins; Mark Kyle; Murali Adusumalli; Adnan Begovic; Santosh Rao
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Nabilone pharmacotherapy for cannabis dependence: A randomized, controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Kevin P Hill; Matthew D Palastro; Staci A Gruber; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Shelly F Greenfield; Scott E Lukas; Roger D Weiss
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2017-09-18

4.  Identifying new cannabis use with urine creatinine-normalized THCCOOH concentrations and time intervals between specimen collections.

Authors:  Michael L Smith; Allan J Barnes; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.367

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.