Literature DB >> 10517459

Composite cervicofacial flap for reconstruction of complex cheek defects.

E Delay1, R Lucas, F Jorquera, G Payement, J L Foyatier.   

Abstract

The authors present the reconstructive technique for complex cheek defects using the composite cervicofacial flap and study the possibilities, advantages, disadvantages, and results that can be expected. The design follows the classic outline of Mustardé's flap. The skin is undermined for 2 cm anterior to the ear, then after incision of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), undermining is continued below the plane of the SMAS, level with the facial nerve branches. It is continued forward to the facial vessels, which give rise to branches that ensure the blood supply of this composite flap and contribute to its high reliability. In the cervical region, undermining is done beneath the platysma, which is transected transversely in the lower cervical region to allow good upward mobility and satisfactory transposition of the flap. The flap is adapted to the defect and the medial suture line is placed as near as possible to the medial limit of the cheek aesthetic unit. The authors carried out a retrospective study of 7 patients with complex facial reconstruction after excision of malignant lesions. The defects measured from 4x4 cm to 9x7 cm. In 4 patients excision included the periosteum, and in 1 patient excision involved the entire thickness and removed the entire anterior half of the cheek. In 4 patients reconstruction involved the cheek and eyelid. In spite of the advanced age of the patients (88, 69, 91, 67, 70, 82, and 59 years), there was no distal edge necrosis. The only complication was a single case of facial paresis, which resolved spontaneously. The results were considered very good in all 7 patients. The authors conclude that the composite flap increases the possibilities of the cervicofacial flap. It is more mobile, more reliable, thicker, and more adaptable. It can be used in complex cheek defects that involve the periosteum, or even in full-thickness defects. The quality of the results obtained using this flap represents a considerable advance in facial reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10517459     DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199910000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  6 in total

Review 1.  Approach to Reconstruction of Cheek Defects.

Authors:  Berkay Başağaoğlu; Mohin Bhadkamkar; Pierce Hollier; Edward Reece
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Cheek rotation flap reconstruction--an anthropometric appraisal of surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Gregor F Raschke; Ulrich M Rieger; Rolf-Dieter Bader; Arndt Guentsch; Oliver Schaefer; Stefan Elstner; Stefan Schultze-Mosgau
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Reconstructive considerations in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the cheek.

Authors:  N Saito; A Tsutsumida; H Furukawa; M Sekido; A Oyama; E Funayama; A Saito; Y Yamamoto
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.124

4.  Reconstruction of periorbital defects using a modified Tenzel flap.

Authors:  Jin An Cha; Kyung Ah Lee
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2020-02-20

5.  Control of the Suborbital Cheek in Pediatric Patients: Working in the Deep Plane.

Authors:  Ara A Salibian; Barry M Zide
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-11-27

6.  A Method to Reproduce Symmetry in Midfacial Reconstruction: A Report of 19 Cases.

Authors:  Xiaoli Lou; Chunyu Xue; Joseph A Molnar; Hongda Bi
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.373

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.