BACKGROUND: The role of lymphocytes and their subpopulations in lung fibrosis is as yet unclear. OBJECTIVE: To define the role of immunomodulation in bleomycin-induced inflammatory fibrotic lung injury, by testing the effect of two known Th1 inhibitors: linomide and pentoxifylline. METHODS: C57BL/6 mice were treated by a single intratracheal instillation of 0.06 mg bleomycin in 0.01 ml saline or saline alone. Treatment groups included: (1) intratracheal bleomycin and daily treatment with linomide or pentoxifylline; (2) intratracheal bleomycin and daily water; (3) intratracheal saline and daily linomide or pentoxifylline; (4) intratracheal saline and daily water. Linomide and pentoxifylline were available per os in the drinking water from 1 day prior to intratracheal instillation. Animals were studied 14 days after intratracheal instillation. Lung injury was evaluated by total and differential cell count in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, by a semiquantitative morphological index of lung injury and a quantitative image analysis of cellularity, fibrosis fraction and alveolar wall area fraction, and by biochemical analysis of lung hydroxyproline content. RESULTS: Linomide or pentoxifylline did not cause any lung injury in saline-treated control mice. Overt signs of lung injury were apparent in bleomycin-treated mice. These changes were not affected by daily treatment with linomide or pentoxifylline, which were given in the highest tolerable dose. CONCLUSION: This study does not support the use of linomide or pentoxifylline to prevent or ameliorate lung fibrosis and may suggest that drug-induced differentiation of T lymphocytes into Th1/th2 subpopulations does not affect the evolution of bleomycin-induced lung injury.
BACKGROUND: The role of lymphocytes and their subpopulations in lung fibrosis is as yet unclear. OBJECTIVE: To define the role of immunomodulation in bleomycin-induced inflammatory fibrotic lung injury, by testing the effect of two known Th1 inhibitors: linomide and pentoxifylline. METHODS: C57BL/6 mice were treated by a single intratracheal instillation of 0.06 mg bleomycin in 0.01 ml saline or saline alone. Treatment groups included: (1) intratracheal bleomycin and daily treatment with linomide or pentoxifylline; (2) intratracheal bleomycin and daily water; (3) intratracheal saline and daily linomide or pentoxifylline; (4) intratracheal saline and daily water. Linomide and pentoxifylline were available per os in the drinking water from 1 day prior to intratracheal instillation. Animals were studied 14 days after intratracheal instillation. Lung injury was evaluated by total and differential cell count in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, by a semiquantitative morphological index of lung injury and a quantitative image analysis of cellularity, fibrosis fraction and alveolar wall area fraction, and by biochemical analysis of lung hydroxyproline content. RESULTS:Linomide or pentoxifylline did not cause any lung injury in saline-treated control mice. Overt signs of lung injury were apparent in bleomycin-treated mice. These changes were not affected by daily treatment with linomide or pentoxifylline, which were given in the highest tolerable dose. CONCLUSION: This study does not support the use of linomide or pentoxifylline to prevent or ameliorate lung fibrosis and may suggest that drug-induced differentiation of T lymphocytes into Th1/th2 subpopulations does not affect the evolution of bleomycin-induced lung injury.
Authors: Michael J Segel; Rami Aqeilan; Keren Zilka; Haya Lorberboum-Galski; Shulamit B Wallach-Dayan; Michael W Conner; Thomas G Christensen; Raphael Breuer Journal: Int J Exp Pathol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 1.925