Literature DB >> 10516458

The use of long-term defunctionalized bladder in renal transplantation: is it safe?

X Martin1, R Aboutaieb, S Soliman, A el Essawy, M Dawahra, N Lefrancois.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the use of defunctionalized bladder in renal transplantation, concerning surgical complications.
METHODS: In order to assess the complication rate of ureteral reimplantation in long-term defunctionalized bladder, we compared 20 patients on haemodialysis for more than 15 years (group I) with another 20 patients on haemodialysis for less than 5 years (group II). None of these patients had renal failure due to urological causes or neurogenic bladder. Non-stented extravesical ureteroneocystostomy was done routinely in all patients except 1 in group II who underwent Politano-Leadbetter ureteroneocystostomy and 7 patients in group I who underwent Politano-Leadbetter (3 patients) and pyelo-ureteral anastomosis using the recipient's native ureter (4 patients). The amount of residual urine was insignificant (<100 cm(3)) in both groups.
RESULTS: The mean postoperative bladder catheterization period was 7.8 days in group I and 4.2 days in group II. Postoperative urinary tract infections were observed in 9 cases of group I and in 4 cases of group II. No surgical complications occurred in patients of group II, while there were 6 patients with surgical complications in group I: stenosis after a pyelo-ureteral anastomosis (1 case), stenosis after a ureterovesical anastomosis with Politano-Leadbetter technique (1 case), urinary fistulae (3 cases; 1 with Politano-Leadbetter ureteroneocystostomy and 2 cases with pyelo-ureteral anastomosis), and vesico-ureteral reflux (1 case with Politano-Leadbetter ureteroneocystostomy). These 6 cases had the lowest bladder capacity (30-150 cm(3)) among our 40 patients. Graft losses were comparable between the two groups and were not due to surgical complications.
CONCLUSION: Small defunctionalized bladders can be used in kidney transplantation, but it may represent an increased surgical risk due to difficulty in performing ureteral reimplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10516458     DOI: 10.1159/000020029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  5 in total

1.  Bladder capacity in kidney transplant patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Miho Song; Junsoo Park; Young Hoon Kim; Duck Jong Han; Sang Hoon Song; Myung-Soo Choo; Bumsik Hong
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Renal transplantation in children with posterior urethral valves.

Authors:  Santiago Mendizabal; Isabel Zamora; Agustin Serrano; Maria Jose Sanahuja; Ezena Roman; Carlos Dominguez; Pedro Ortega; Fernando García Ibarra
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Bladder dysfunction and end stage renal disease.

Authors:  Dirk-Henrik Zermann; Uwe Löffler; Olaf Reichelt; Heiko Wunderlich; Steffen Wilhelm; Jörg Schubert
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Peritoneal Dialysis for Potential Kidney Transplant Recipients: Pride or Prejudice?

Authors:  Luca Nardelli; Antonio Scalamogna; Piergiorgio Messa; Maurizio Gallieni; Roberto Cacciola; Federica Tripodi; Giuseppe Castellano; Evaldo Favi
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  Urological Complications Associated With Pyeloureterostomy Without Ipsilateral Nephrectomy in Renal Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Hernani M Neto; Helio Tedesco Silva Junior; José M Pestana; Renato D Foresto; Wilson F Aguiar
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.782

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.