Literature DB >> 10516443

Factors influencing the course of calcium oxalate stone disease.

H G Tiselius1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of previous stone formation, urine and stone composition on the further course of the disease in recurrent calcium stone formers without pharmacological treatment.
METHOD: The course of the disease was analysed during a prospective follow-up period by means of Kaplan-Meier estimates. At the start of follow-up the patients were subgrouped with regard to their previous history of stone formation expressed as stone age index (SAI = 100 x number of stones/age), urine composition, stone composition, and sex. In 223 of the patients was it possible to calculate AP(CaOx) index(s), a standardized estimate of the ion-activity product of calcium oxalate.
RESULTS: The 446 patients (329 men, 117 women) who were considered representative of an average population of recurrent calcium stone formers, had a 5-year recurrence risk of approximately 50%. Patients with an SAI <2 had a lower recurrence risk than those with an SAI >2 and a corresponding difference was recorded between patients with SAI levels <5 and >5. Furthermore, female patients had a lower risk of new stone formation than male patients. Patients with an AP(CaOx) index(s) of 1.5 or more had a significantly higher recurrence risk than those with a lower index, a difference that was most pronounced in female stone formers. A slightly higher risk of recurrent stone formation during the follow-up period could also be related to the presence of calcium phosphate in the stone, a high AP(CaP) index(s) (a standardized estimate of the ion-activity product of calcium phosphate) and a low concentration of citrate.
CONCLUSION: AP(CaOx) index(s) and SAI were the most obvious predictors of the recurrence risk and these two variables, together with information on the sex distribution, might be useful for deriving an expected recurrence risk at a defined point of time in a group of recurrent stone formers. Such an estimate can be valuable for conclusions on the efficacy of different stone-preventive treatments when an appropriate control group is lacking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10516443     DOI: 10.1159/000020015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  8 in total

Review 1.  Metabolic risk-evaluation and prevention of recurrence in stone disease: does it make sense?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  A hypothesis of calcium stone formation: an interpretation of stone research during the past decades.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-01-19

3.  Are changes in urinary parameters during pregnancy clinically significant?

Authors:  Sefa Resim; Resim Sefa; Hasan Cetin Ekerbicer; Ekerbicer Hasan Cetin; Gurkan Kiran; Kiran Gurkan; Metin Kilinc; Kilinc Metin
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-04-14

Review 4.  Should we modify the principles of risk evaluation and recurrence preventive treatment of patients with calcium oxalate stone disease in view of the etiologic importance of calcium phosphate?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Papillary calcifications: a new prognostic factor in idiopathic calcium oxalate urolithiasis.

Authors:  Walter Ludwig Strohmaier; Markus Hörmann; Gernot Schubert
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Assessment of crystallization risk formulas in pediatric calcium stone-formers.

Authors:  Przemysław Sikora; Małgorzata Zajaczkowska; Bernd Hoppe
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  LITHORISK.COM: the novel version of a software for calculating and visualizing the risk of renal stone.

Authors:  Martino Marangella; Michele Petrarulo; Corrado Vitale; Piergiuseppe Daniele; Silvio Sammartano
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Urine and stone analysis for the investigation of the renal stone former: a consensus conference.

Authors:  James C Williams; Giovanni Gambaro; Allen Rodgers; John Asplin; Olivier Bonny; Antonia Costa-Bauzá; Pietro Manuel Ferraro; Giovanni Fogazzi; Daniel G Fuster; David S Goldfarb; Félix Grases; Ita P Heilberg; Dik Kok; Emmanuel Letavernier; Giuseppe Lippi; Martino Marangella; Antonio Nouvenne; Michele Petrarulo; Roswitha Siener; Hans-Göran Tiselius; Olivier Traxer; Alberto Trinchieri; Emanuele Croppi; William G Robertson
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.436

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.