Literature DB >> 10516414

Antihyperglycemic treatment in diabetics with coronary disease: increased metformin-associated mortality over a 5-year follow-up.

E Z Fisman1, A Tenenbaum, M Benderly, U Goldbourt, S Behar, M Motro.   

Abstract

Mortality rates are considerably higher in chronic ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) than in those who are nondiabetics. The relationship between different types of antihyperglycemic pharmacological therapy and mortality rate in this NIDDM population is uncertain. We aimed to examine the survival in NIDDM patients with IHD using various types of oral antidiabetic treatments over a 5-year follow-up period. The study sample comprised 11,440 patients with a previous myocardial infarction and/or stable anginal syndrome, aged 45-74 years, who were screened, but not included in the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention study. Among them, 9,045 were nondiabetics and 2,395 diabetics. The diabetic patients were divided into four groups on the basis of their therapeutic regimen at screening: diet alone (n = 990), sulfonylureas (n = 1,041), metformin (n = 78) and a combination of a sulfonylurea and metformin (n = 266). All NIDDM groups were similar with regard to age, gender, hypertension, smoking, heart failure, angina and prior myocardial infarction. Crude mortality rate was lower in the nondiabetic group (11.21 vs. 21.8%; p < 0.001). In the diabetic group, mortality was 18.5% for patients on diet alone, 22.5% for those on sulfonylureas, 25.6% for patients on metformin, and 31.6% for the combined sulfonylurea/metformin group (p < 0.01). When analyzing age-adjusted mortality rate and actuarial survival curves, the lowest mortality was found in patients on diet alone and the highest in patients on metformin (alone or in combination with sulfonylureas). After adjustment for variables connected with long-term prognosis, the use of metformin was associated with increased relative risk (RR) for all-cause mortality of 1.42 (95% CI 1.10-1.85), whereas the use of sulfonylureas alone was not [RR 1.11 (95% CI 0.90-1.36)]. NIDDM patients with IHD using metformin, alone or in combination with sulfonylureas, exhibited a significantly increased mortality. Until the results of problem-oriented prospective studies on oral control of NIDDM will be available, alternative therapeutic approaches should be investigated in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10516414     DOI: 10.1159/000006909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiology        ISSN: 0008-6312            Impact factor:   1.869


  14 in total

1.  Multiple outcomes associated with the use of metformin and sulphonylureas in type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study in Italy.

Authors:  Giovanni Corrao; Silvana Antonietta Romio; Antonella Zambon; Luca Merlino; Emanuele Bosi; Marina Scavini
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Oral antidiabetic treatment in patients with coronary disease: time-related increased mortality on combined glyburide/metformin therapy over a 7.7-year follow-up.

Authors:  E Z Fisman; A Tenenbaum ; V Boyko; M Benderly; Y Adler; A Friedensohn; M Kohanovski; R Rotzak; H Schneider; S Behar; M Motro
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 3.  Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Shelley R Salpeter; Elizabeth Greyber; Gary A Pasternak; Edwin E Salpeter
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

Review 4.  Association of Metformin with the Mortality and Incidence of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Pre-existing Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Tian Li; Rui Providencia; Wenhua Jiang; Manling Liu; Lu Yu; Chunhu Gu; Alex Chia Yu Chang; Heng Ma
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Type of preadmission glucose-lowering treatment and prognosis among patients hospitalised with myocardial infarction: a nationwide follow-up study.

Authors:  H T Horsdal; S P Johnsen; F Søndergaard; J Rungby
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Relation of severe coronary artery narrowing to insulin or thiazolidinedione use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes Study).

Authors:  Rodica Pop-Busui; Manuel Lombardero; Victor Lavis; Alan Forker; Jennifer Green; Mary Korytkowski; Burton E Sobel; Teresa L Z Jones
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  The role of sulphonylureas in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Marc Rendell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  A cardiologic approach to non-insulin antidiabetic pharmacotherapy in patients with heart disease.

Authors:  Enrique Z Fisman; Alexander Tenenbaum
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 9.951

Review 9.  The role of co-morbidity in the selection of antidiabetic pharmacotherapy in type-2 diabetes.

Authors:  Diethelm Tschöpe; Markolf Hanefeld; Juris J Meier; Anselm K Gitt; Martin Halle; Peter Bramlage; Petra-Maria Schumm-Draeger
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 9.951

10.  Cardiovascular risk factor management of myocardial infarction patients with and without diabetes in the Netherlands between 2002 and 2006: a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data.

Authors:  Sabita S Soedamah-Muthu; Johanna M Geleijnse; Erik J Giltay; Daan Kromhout
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.