Literature DB >> 10515981

Convergent mechanosensory input structures the firing phase of a steering motor neuron in the blowfly, Calliphora.

A Fayyazuddin1, M H Dickinson.   

Abstract

The first basalar muscle (B1) is 1 of 17 small steering muscles in flies that control changes in wing stroke kinematics during flight. The B1 is often tonically active, firing a single phase-locked action potential in each and every wingbeat cycle. Changes in activation phase alter the biomechanical properties of B1, which in turn cause aerodynamically relevant changes in wing motion. The phase-locked firing of the B1 motor neuron (MNB1), is thought to arise from an interaction of wingbeat-synchronous inputs from the wings and from specialized equilibrium organs called halteres that beat antiphase to the wings and function to detect angular rotation of the body during flight. We investigated how the wing and haltere inputs interact to determine the firing phase of MNB1. Our results indicate that both wing and haltere afferents make strong monosynaptic connections with MNB1, consisting of fast electrical and slow Ca(2+)-sensitive components. Although both the wing and haltere-evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) display the two components, their relative contribution is different for the two inputs. Whereas the haltere-evoked EPSP is dominated by the fast electrical component, the wing-evoked EPSP is dominated by a large chemically mediated component and displays an additional prolonged Ca(2+)-dependent component that is absent in the haltere-evoked EPSP. Both inputs display an activity-dependent fatigue affecting both electrical and Ca(2+)-sensitive components, from which the haltere synapse recovers more rapidly. The net result of these synaptic differences is that the two pathways differ significantly in their relative ability to evoke action potentials in MNB1. Although the haltere pathway displays greater temporal precision, the wing pathway is stronger, judged by its ability to entrain MNB1 within a background of haltere stimulation. We propose a model by which these physiological differences play a functional role in tuning the firing phase of MNB1 during flight. The wing input may serve primarily to set the background firing phase of MNB1, whereas the haltere input serves to transiently advance the firing phase during equilibrium reflexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10515981     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.4.1916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  Central gating of fly optomotor response.

Authors:  Juergen Haag; Adrian Wertz; Alexander Borst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Kinematic diversity suggests expanded roles for fly halteres.

Authors:  Joshua M Hall; Dane P McLoughlin; Nicholas D Kathman; Alexandra M Yarger; Shwetha Mureli; Jessica L Fox
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Body rate decoupling using haltere mid-stroke measurements for inertial flight stabilization in Diptera.

Authors:  R A Thompson; M F Wehling; J H Evers; W E Dixon
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  A neural basis for gyroscopic force measurement in the halteres of Holorusia.

Authors:  J L Fox; T L Daniel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Biomechanical basis of wing and haltere coordination in flies.

Authors:  Tanvi Deora; Amit Kumar Singh; Sanjay P Sane
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Representation of Haltere Oscillations and Integration with Visual Inputs in the Fly Central Complex.

Authors:  Nicholas D Kathman; Jessica L Fox
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Single mechanosensory neurons encode lateral displacements using precise spike timing and thresholds.

Authors:  Alexandra M Yarger; Jessica L Fox
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Limitations of rotational manoeuvrability in insects and hummingbirds: evaluating the effects of neuro-biomechanical delays and muscle mechanical power.

Authors:  Pan Liu; Bo Cheng
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Predicting fruit fly's sensing rate with insect flight simulations.

Authors:  Song Chang; Z Jane Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Limit-cycle-based control of the myogenic wingbeat rhythm in the fruit fly Drosophila.

Authors:  Jan Bartussek; A Kadir Mutlu; Martin Zapotocky; Steven N Fry
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.