Literature DB >> 10515942

Divergent regulation of the evolutionarily closely related promoters of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae STA2 and MUC1 genes.

M Gagiano1, D Van Dyk, F F Bauer, M G Lambrechts, I S Pretorius.   

Abstract

The 5' upstream regions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae glucoamylase-encoding genes STA1 to -3 and of the MUC1 (or FLO11) gene, which is critical for pseudohyphal development, invasive growth, and flocculation, are almost identical, and the genes are coregulated to a large extent. Besides representing the largest yeast promoters identified to date, these regions are of particular interest from both a functional and an evolutionary point of view. Transcription of the genes indeed seems to be dependent on numerous transcription factors which integrate the information of a complex network of signaling pathways, while the very limited sequence differences between them should allow the study of promoter evolution on a molecular level. To investigate the transcriptional regulation, we compared the transcription levels conferred by the STA2 and MUC1 promoters under various growth conditions. Our data show that transcription of both genes responded similarly to most environmental signals but also indicated significant divergence in some aspects. We identified distinct areas within the promoters that show specific responses to the activating effect of Flo8p, Msn1p (or Mss10p, Fup1p, or Phd2p), and Mss11p as well as to carbon catabolite repression. We also identified the STA10 repressive effect as the absence of Flo8p, a transcriptional activator of flocculation genes in S. cerevisiae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10515942      PMCID: PMC103787     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  51 in total

1.  Transcriptional control of glucoamylase synthesis in vegetatively growing and sporulating Saccharomyces species.

Authors:  I S Pretorius; D Modena; M Vanoni; S Englard; J Marmur
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Combinatorial control required for the specificity of yeast MAPK signaling.

Authors:  H D Madhani; G R Fink
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  GAL1-GAL10 divergent promoter region of Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains negative control elements in addition to functionally separate and possibly overlapping upstream activating sequences.

Authors:  R W West; S M Chen; H Putz; G Butler; M Banerjee
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Identification of a functional TATA element in the STA2 glucoamylase gene promoter from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M A Vivier; I S Pretorius
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.886

5.  Regulation of STA1 gene expression by MAT during the life cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A M Dranginis
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  MAP kinase and cAMP filamentation signaling pathways converge on the unusually large promoter of the yeast FLO11 gene.

Authors:  S Rupp; E Summers; H J Lo; H Madhani; G Fink
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Ras2 signals via the Cdc42/Ste20/mitogen-activated protein kinase module to induce filamentous growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  H U Mösch; R L Roberts; G R Fink
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Control of maltase synthesis in yeast.

Authors:  R Needleman
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  Construction of a set of convenient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C.

Authors:  F Winston; C Dollard; S L Ricupero-Hovasse
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 10.  The glucoamylase multigene family in Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. diastaticus: an overview.

Authors:  I S Pretorius; M G Lambrechts; J Marmur
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 8.250

View more
  16 in total

1.  Mss11p is a central element of the regulatory network that controls FLO11 expression and invasive growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Dewald van Dyk; Isak S Pretorius; Florian F Bauer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Systematic measurement of transcription factor-DNA interactions by targeted mass spectrometry identifies candidate gene regulatory proteins.

Authors:  Hamid Mirzaei; Theo A Knijnenburg; Bong Kim; Max Robinson; Paola Picotti; Gregory W Carter; Song Li; David J Dilworth; Jimmy K Eng; John D Aitchison; Ilya Shmulevich; Timothy Galitski; Ruedi Aebersold; Jeffrey Ranish
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Synthetic lethal analysis implicates Ste20p, a p21-activated potein kinase, in polarisome activation.

Authors:  April S Goehring; David A Mitchell; Amy Hin Yan Tong; Megan E Keniry; Charles Boone; George F Sprague
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.138

4.  The Glc7p-interacting protein Bud14p attenuates polarized growth, pheromone response, and filamentous growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Paul J Cullen; George F Sprague
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2002-12

5.  KRH1 and KRH2 are functionally non-redundant in signaling for pseudohyphal differentiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Revathi S Iyer; Paike Jayadeva Bhat
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.886

6.  Recruitment of the Swi/Snf complex by Ste12-Tec1 promotes Flo8-Mss11-mediated activation of STA1 expression.

Authors:  Tae Soo Kim; Hye Young Kim; Jin Ho Yoon; Hyen Sam Kang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Identification of novel activation mechanisms for FLO11 regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ramón R Barrales; Juan Jimenez; José I Ibeas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Nrg1 and nrg2 transcriptional repressors are differently regulated in response to carbon source.

Authors:  Cristin D Berkey; Valmik K Vyas; Marian Carlson
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2004-04

9.  Cellular differentiation in response to nutrient availability: The repressor of meiosis, Rme1p, positively regulates invasive growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Dewald van Dyk; Guy Hansson; Isak S Pretorius; Florian F Bauer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Glucose repression of STA1 expression is mediated by the Nrg1 and Sfl1 repressors and the Srb8-11 complex.

Authors:  Tae Soo Kim; Sung Bae Lee; Hyen Sam Kang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.