Literature DB >> 10515297

High-dose discrimination training with midazolam: context determines generalization profile.

N A Ator1.   

Abstract

In previous work, greater differentiation among ligands for the benzodiazepine site was found in rats trained to discriminate among vehicle, 0.32, and 3.2 mg/kg midazolam than in animals trained to discriminate a single midazolam dose from vehicle (i.e., virtually all test drugs occasioned low-dose midazolam-appropriate responding, but most did not occasion high-dose midazolam-appropriate responding even at high test doses). A possibility was that merely training with 3.2 mg/kg-midazolam (not previously studied) would result in greater selectivity than training with lower midazolam doses. In the present study, rats were trained to discriminate 3.2 mg/kg i.p. midazolam from no drug under a two-lever, food-maintained, procedure; and drugs from the previous three-lever studies were tested. Triazolam, bretazenil, clonazepam, lorazepam, midazolam, zolpidem, chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital, and flurazepam all dose-dependently occasioned >80% responding on the midazolam-appropriate lever in roughly that order of potency. Only triazolam had occasioned midazolam 3.2 mg/kg-appropriate responding in the previous work. The greater differentiation among these drugs in the dose-vs.-dose procedure likely was due to a training dose context rather than to the high training dose per se.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10515297     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(99)00050-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  7 in total

1.  Benzodiazepine and neuroactive steroid combinations in rats: anxiolytic-like and discriminative stimulus effects.

Authors:  Barak W Gunter; Sherman A Jones; Ian A Paul; Donna M Platt; James K Rowlett
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  The behavioral pharmacology of zolpidem: evidence for the functional significance of α1-containing GABA(A) receptors.

Authors:  Amanda C Fitzgerald; Brittany T Wright; Scott A Heldt
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Self-administration of bretazenil under progressive-ratio schedules: behavioral economic analysis of the role intrinsic efficacy plays in the reinforcing effects of benzodiazepines.

Authors:  Stephanie C Licata; James K Rowlett
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Differential interactions engendered by benzodiazepine and neuroactive steroid combinations on schedule-controlled responding in rats.

Authors:  Barak W Gunter; Donna M Platt; James K Rowlett
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Discriminative stimulus effects of L-838,417 (7-tert-butyl-3-(2,5-difluoro-phenyl)-6-(2-methyl-2H-[1,2,4]triazol-3-ylmethoxy)-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazine): role of GABA(A) receptor subtypes.

Authors:  Stephanie C Licata; Donna M Platt; Daniela Rüedi-Bettschen; John R Atack; Gerard R Dawson; Michael L Van Linn; James M Cook; James K Rowlett
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  Discriminative stimulus effects of pregnanolone in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Lisa R Gerak; Charles P France
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Lack of generalisation between the GABAA receptor agonist, gaboxadol, and allosteric modulators of the benzodiazepine binding site in the rat drug discrimination procedure.

Authors:  Signe Michelsen; Connie Sánchez; Bjarke Ebert
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 4.415

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.