Literature DB >> 10514941

Active life in old age. Combining measures of functional ability and social participation.

K Avlund1, B E Holstein, E L Mortensen, M Schroll.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This paper describes a new measure of Active Life Expectancy, called Active Life Classification (ALC) in which the criterion for successful aging is a combination of good functional ability and high social participation.
OBJECTIVES: 1) to describe the distribution of ALC among 75-year-old men and women, 2) to investigate the association between ALC and life satisfaction and 3) to describe how ALC is determined by socio-demographic, psycho-social, and health factors.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional population survey.
SETTING: Eleven municipalities in the Western part of Copenhagen County in 1989.
SUBJECTS: A random sample of 75-year-old people who were invited to participate in the study (participation rate: 89, n = 477). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: ALC is a combination of two dichotomized variables: functional ability (dependent vs not dependent of help) and social participation (low vs. high).
RESULTS: For both men and women an active life (measured by ALC) was significantly associated with life satisfaction. For men only good self-rated health was related to ALC in the multivariate analysis. Among women high income, many social contacts, good self-rated health, good memory and lack of chronic diseases were associated with ALC.
CONCLUSIONS: It is an advantage to combine functional ability and social participation in the description of quality of life in old age, as 1) a high social participation may compensate for a poor functional ability, and vice versa, 2) the combined measure is meaningful for both sexes, and 3) it gives more information than the two concepts used as separate outcome measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10514941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dan Med Bull        ISSN: 0907-8916


  7 in total

1.  The Maastricht social participation profile: development and clinimetric properties in older adults with a chronic physical illness.

Authors:  Godelief M J Mars; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Marcel W M Post; Ireen M Proot; Ilse Mesters; Jacques T M van Eijk
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Prevalence and factors associated with thriving in older adulthood: a 10-year population-based study.

Authors:  Mark S Kaplan; Nathalie Huguet; Heather Orpana; David Feeny; Bentson H McFarland; Nancy Ross
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Does Social Participation Predict Better Health? A Longitudinal Study in Rural Malawi.

Authors:  Tyler W Myroniuk; Philip Anglewicz
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2015-12

4.  Assessment of Self-Efficacy and its Relationship with Frailty in the Elderly.

Authors:  Nobutaka Doba; Yasuharu Tokuda; Keiichirou Saiki; Toshio Kushiro; Masumi Hirano; Yoshihiro Matsubara; Shigeaki Hinohara
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 1.271

5.  Prevalence of healthy aging among community dwelling adults age 70 and older from five European countries.

Authors:  Simeon Schietzel; Patricia O Chocano-Bedoya; Angelique Sadlon; Michael Gagesch; Walter C Willett; Endel J Orav; Reto W Kressig; Bruno Vellas; René Rizzoli; José A P da Silva; Michael Blauth; John A Kanis; Andreas Egli; Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  The Sharing Economy in China's Aging Industry: Applications, Challenges, and Recommendations.

Authors:  Yaolin Hu; Jian Wang; Stephen Nicholas; Elizabeth Maitland
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Poor self-rated health did not increase risk of permanent nursing placement or mortality in people with mild Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Anni Brit Sternhagen Nielsen; Volkert Siersma; Gunhild Waldemar; Frans Boch Waldorff
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.921

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.