Literature DB >> 10514229

Modular organization of human leg withdrawal reflexes elicited by electrical stimulation of the foot sole.

O K Andersen1, F A Sonnenborg, L Arendt-Nielsen.   

Abstract

Human withdrawal reflex receptive fields were determined for leg muscles by randomized, electrical stimulation at 16 different positions on the foot sole. Tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius medialis, peroneus longus, soleus, rectus femoris, and biceps femoris reflexes, and ankle joint angle changes were recorded from 14 subjects in sitting position. Tibialis anterior reflexes were evoked at the medial, distal foot and correlated well with ankle dorsal flexion. Gastrocnemius medialis reflexes were evoked on the heel and correlated with plantar flexion. Stimulation on the distal, medial sole resulted in inversion (correlated best with tibialis anterior activity), whereas stimulation of the distal, lateral sole evoked eversion. Biceps femoris reflexes were evoked on the entire sole followed by a small reflex in rectus femoris. A detailed withdrawal reflex organization, in which each lower leg muscle has its own receptive field, may explain the ankle joint responses. The thigh activity consisted primarily of flexor activation. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10514229     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199911)22:11<1520::aid-mus6>3.0.co;2-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  28 in total

1.  Modulation of heat evoked nociceptive withdrawal reflexes by painful intramuscular conditioning stimulation.

Authors:  Ole K Andersen; Carsten Dahl Mørch; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Comparison of the electrically evoked leg withdrawal reflex in cerebellar patients and healthy controls.

Authors:  T F B Kolb; S Lachauer; B Schoch; M Gerwig; D Timmann; F P Kolb
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Plantar cutaneous input modulates differently spinal reflexes in subjects with intact and injured spinal cord.

Authors:  M Knikou
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Withdrawal reflex responses evoked by repetitive painful stimulation delivered on the sole of the foot during late stance: site, phase, and frequency modulation.

Authors:  Erika G Spaich; Jonas Emborg; Thomas Collet; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Ole Kaeseler Andersen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Withdrawal reflexes examined during human gait by ground reaction forces: site and gait phase dependency.

Authors:  Jonas Emborg; Erika G Spaich; Ole K Andersen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Experimental and model-based analysis of differences in perception of cutaneous electrical stimulation across the sole of the foot.

Authors:  Ken Steffen Frahm; Carsten Dahl Mørch; Warren M Grill; Ole Kæseler Andersen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  The nociceptive withdrawal response of the foot in the spinalized rat exhibits limited dependence on stimulus location.

Authors:  Corey L Cleland; Craig E Esquivel; Heath T Davis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Neuromuscular function in painful knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Carol A Courtney; Michael A O'Hearn; T George Hornby
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-12

9.  Modulation of flexion reflex induced by hip angle changes in human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Maria Knikou; Elizabeth Kay; William Zev Rymer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Comparison of the classically conditioned withdrawal reflex in cerebellar patients and healthy control subjects during stance: I. electrophysiological characteristics.

Authors:  D Timmann; T Kaulich; W Föhre; D F Kutz; M Gerwig; F P Kolb
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.