Literature DB >> 10514117

Reducing the endoscopic workload: does serological testing for Helicobacter pylori help?

P E Slade1, A R Davidson, A Steel, R A Cox, P A Blackburn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Serological screening for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in young (< or = 45 years) dyspeptic patients has been used to avoid oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD). We used serology to identify seronegative and seropositive patients without sinister symptoms and combined approaches of avoiding OGD in both groups. We aimed to determine the reduction of OGD in this group.
DESIGN: Prospective study on the treatment of 232 patients with dyspepsia.
SETTING: Six hundred and fifty bed district general hospital serving rural Northamptonshire, UK.
INTERVENTIONS: Two hundred and thirty-two patients referred by local general practitioners for OGD were offered serology. Symptom severity was scored using a questionnaire. One hundred and eleven seronegative patients received symptomatic treatment, 105 seropositive patients received triple therapy for 1 week. Sixteen patients with equivocal results were offered OGD. Patients were followed up after 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Severity of dyspepsia symptoms and proportion of patients returning for OGD.
RESULTS: Fifteen equivocal patients underwent OGD, one refused. Forty-six patients (33 seronegative, 13 seropositive) had persisting symptoms and underwent OGD. Mean symptom severity was reduced significantly in equivocal (P<0.01), seronegative (P<0.001) and seropositive (P<0.001) patients. Fewer seronegative patients were symptom-free at follow up compared to seropositive patients (n = 15 (16%) vs n = 48 (51%); P<0.001), 171 patients avoided OGD, a 74% reduction.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of H. pylori serology in the management of young dyspeptic patients without sinister symptoms can reduce the OGD workload by 74%, decreasing the length of time that older patients, who are at greater risk of malignant disease, may have to wait for OGD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10514117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  5 in total

1.  Limited impact on endoscopy demand from a primary care based 'test and treat' dyspepsia management strategy: the results of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ian S Shaw; Roland M Valori; André Charlett; Cliodna A M McNulty
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Gastroenterology services in the UK. The burden of disease, and the organisation and delivery of services for gastrointestinal and liver disorders: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  J G Williams; S E Roberts; M F Ali; W Y Cheung; D R Cohen; G Demery; A Edwards; M Greer; M D Hellier; H A Hutchings; B Ip; M F Longo; I T Russell; H A Snooks; J C Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  What have we learned from recent dyspepsia trials?

Authors:  J J Ofman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-12

4.  Helicobacter Pylori "Test-and-Treat" Strategy for Management of Dyspepsia: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Javier P Gisbert; Xavier Calvet
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 5.  Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sulman Siddique; Abiram Selladurai; Akash Gandhi; Benjamin Low; Mohammad Yaghoobi; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.