A J Bogardus1, B R Neas, S M Sullivan. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City 73190, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study describes the personal and practice characteristics of oral and maxillofacial surgeons, with an emphasis on gender differences. Potential explanations for differences found are offered. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 39-item questionnaire was designed to address areas of suspected differences between male and female oral and maxillofacial surgeons. It included items regarding training, certification, practice type and location, time spent working, practice composition, and personal characteristics. Identical questionnaires were sent to all of the 130 female oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) registered with AAOMS, as well as to 264 randomly sampled male OMSs. RESULTS: Of the 192 responses received, 109 were from male surgeons, and 83 were from females, 56.8% versus 43.2% of the total. For men, the response rate was 41.3%, whereas the rate was 68.3% for the women; overall, 48.7% of the 394 oral surgeons responded. Profiles of the "average" male and female OMS showed similarities with regard to race, training, and reasons for choosing an OMS career. Age, marital status, number of children, physical characteristics, and use of time outside of work indicated some significant personal differences, as did practice characteristics, including income, number of years in practice, hours spent working, and number of patients seen. Clear gender-based trends were found regarding opinions of physical and mechanical disadvantages, with women more strongly denying such problems. A variety of both positive and negative viewpoints were elicited by the free comment section. CONCLUSIONS: Although male and female OMSs are similar with regard to most variables investigated, some significant differences do exist.
PURPOSE: This study describes the personal and practice characteristics of oral and maxillofacial surgeons, with an emphasis on gender differences. Potential explanations for differences found are offered. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 39-item questionnaire was designed to address areas of suspected differences between male and female oral and maxillofacial surgeons. It included items regarding training, certification, practice type and location, time spent working, practice composition, and personal characteristics. Identical questionnaires were sent to all of the 130 female oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) registered with AAOMS, as well as to 264 randomly sampled male OMSs. RESULTS: Of the 192 responses received, 109 were from male surgeons, and 83 were from females, 56.8% versus 43.2% of the total. For men, the response rate was 41.3%, whereas the rate was 68.3% for the women; overall, 48.7% of the 394 oral surgeons responded. Profiles of the "average" male and female OMS showed similarities with regard to race, training, and reasons for choosing an OMS career. Age, marital status, number of children, physical characteristics, and use of time outside of work indicated some significant personal differences, as did practice characteristics, including income, number of years in practice, hours spent working, and number of patients seen. Clear gender-based trends were found regarding opinions of physical and mechanical disadvantages, with women more strongly denying such problems. A variety of both positive and negative viewpoints were elicited by the free comment section. CONCLUSIONS: Although male and female OMSs are similar with regard to most variables investigated, some significant differences do exist.