Literature DB >> 10513801

Function and health-related quality of life: results from a randomized controlled trial of leflunomide versus methotrexate or placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Leflunomide Rheumatoid Arthritis Investigators Group.

V Strand1, P Tugwell, C Bombardier, A Maetzel, B Crawford, C Dorrier, A Thompson, G Wells.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of leflunomide or methotrexate compared with placebo in improving function and health-related quality of life in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to examine correlations between response status (as defined by the American College of Rheumatology [ACR] response criteria) and improvement in these measures.
METHODS: This 52-week, multicenter, doubleblind, controlled trial compared responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ), Problem Elicitation Technique (PET), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36), and questions regarding work productivity among 3 treatment groups (leflunomide, methotrexate, and placebo). Improvement in the PET top 5 and SF-36 scales and component scores were compared with ACR response rates.
RESULTS: Clinically meaningful and statistically significant (P<0.0001) improvement in measures of function and heath-related quality of life (MHAQ scores, all scales and disability index of the HAQ, weighted top 5 score of the PET, 5 of 8 scales and physical component score of the SF-36, and work productivity) was seen during treatment with leflunomide in comparison with placebo. Methotrexate administration resulted in significant improvements (P<0.05) in comparison with placebo in the MHAQ scores, HAQ disability index, weighted top 5 score of the PET, physical component score of the SF-36, and bodily pain scale. Compared with methotrexate, leflunomide administration resulted in significantly (P<0.01) more improvement in the MHAQ scores, 5 of 8 scales and disability index of the HAQ, weighted top 5 score of the PET, and 2 of 8 scales and physical component score of the SF-36. Improvements in the PET score, SF-36 physical component score, and work productivity correlated with the ACR responder rates of > or =20% and > or =50% improvement.
CONCLUSION: Significant improvements in function and health-related quality of life occurred in patients with RA during treatment with leflunomide or methotrexate. These findings were clinically meaningful and correlated with the ACR response status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10513801     DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(199909)42:9<1870::AID-ANR11>3.0.CO;2-D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  18 in total

Review 1.  Leflunomide: a review of its use in active rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  A Prakash; B Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Modelling cost effectiveness and cost utility of sequential DMARD therapy including leflunomide for rheumatoid arthritis in Germany: II. The contribution of leflunomide to efficiency.

Authors:  Peter K Schädlich; Henning Zeidler; Angela Zink; Erika Gromnica-Ihle; Matthias Schneider; Christoph Straub; Josef G Brecht; Eduard Huppertz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  [The treatment of juvenile rheumatism: pharmacotherapy].

Authors:  F Weller; H-I Huppertz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral type I collagen treatment in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: I. oral type I collagen does not improve skin in all patients, but may improve skin in late-phase disease.

Authors:  Arnold E Postlethwaite; Weng Kee Wong; Philip Clements; Soumya Chatterjee; Barri J Fessler; Andrew H Kang; Joseph Korn; Maureen Mayes; Peter A Merkel; Jerry A Molitor; Larry Moreland; Naomi Rothfield; Robert W Simms; Edwin A Smith; Robert Spiera; Virginia Steen; Kenneth Warrington; Barbara White; Frederick Wigley; Daniel E Furst
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-06

5.  Abatacept improves both the physical and mental health of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have inadequate response to methotrexate treatment.

Authors:  A S Russell; G V Wallenstein; T Li; M C Martin; R Maclean; B Blaisdell; K Gajria; J C Cole; J-C Becker; P Emery
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Modelling cost effectiveness and cost utility of sequential DMARD therapy including leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis in Germany: I. Selected DMARDs and patient-related costs.

Authors:  Peter K Schädlich; Henning Zeidler; Angela Zink; Erika Gromnica-Ihle; Matthias Schneider; Christoph Straub; Josef G Brecht; Eduard Huppertz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Survival and effectiveness of leflunomide compared with methotrexate and sulfasalazine in rheumatoid arthritis: a matched observational study.

Authors:  D Aletaha; T Stamm; T Kapral; G Eberl; J Grisar; K P Machold; J S Smolen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 8.  Methotrexate intolerance in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis: what are the alternatives?

Authors:  Alexandros Drosos
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  Methotrexate for treating rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Maria Angeles Lopez-Olivo; Harish R Siddhanamatha; Beverley Shea; Peter Tugwell; George A Wells; Maria E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-10

Review 10.  Quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis : which drugs might make a difference?

Authors:  Barbara Blumenauer; Ann Cranney; Jennifer Clinch; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.