V K Branch1, G Graves, M Hanczyc, P E Lipsky. 1. Rheumatic Diseases Division, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas 75235-8884, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of examination skills of internal medicine residents and to assess whether an intervention by trained persons with arthritis could have a greater impact on their examination skills than participation in an ambulatory care training experience. METHODS:Twenty-seven residents attended a 6-week ambulatory care rotation that included didactic teaching as well as attendance at an outpatient arthritis clinic with supervision by rheumatologists. Sixteen residents were randomly assigned to have a training encounter with an arthritis educator along with the standard experience in the arthritis clinic, whereas 11 residents received training in the arthritis clinic only. Arthritis educators evaluated the musculoskeletal examination skills of each resident during the first week of the rotation. The 16 residents in the intervention group received instruction on joint examination techniques by the arthritis educator immediately following their evaluation. At the end of the 6-week rotation, the groups were re-evaluated by a different arthritis educator. A group of 21 rheumatologists was also asked to perform a comprehensive musculoskeletal examination on individual arthritis educators. The arthritis educators assessed the examination of the rheumatologists using the same evaluation instrument that was used to assess the residents. RESULTS: Initially, internal medicine residents carried out the musculoskeletal examination poorly (34.2 +/- 0.09% correct, n = 27). By contrast, the rheumatologists carried out a significantly greater amount of the examination correctly (54.5 +/- 0.05%). The musculoskeletal examination skills of the residents who received additional training from an arthritis educator were significantly greater at the end of the rotation than the group who did not receive this intervention (50.5 +/- 0.10% versus 41.9 +/- 0.14% correct, P = 2.15 x 10(-5). CONCLUSION:Internal medicine residents carried out the musculoskeletal examination poorly. However, an intervention by arthritis educators improved the musculoskeletal examination skills of internal medicine residents significantly and more effectively than the standard clinical teaching in a rheumatology outpatient clinic. The impact of the arthritis educator intervention persisted for at least 5 weeks.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of examination skills of internal medicine residents and to assess whether an intervention by trained persons with arthritis could have a greater impact on their examination skills than participation in an ambulatory care training experience. METHODS: Twenty-seven residents attended a 6-week ambulatory care rotation that included didactic teaching as well as attendance at an outpatientarthritis clinic with supervision by rheumatologists. Sixteen residents were randomly assigned to have a training encounter with an arthritis educator along with the standard experience in the arthritis clinic, whereas 11 residents received training in the arthritis clinic only. Arthritis educators evaluated the musculoskeletal examination skills of each resident during the first week of the rotation. The 16 residents in the intervention group received instruction on joint examination techniques by the arthritis educator immediately following their evaluation. At the end of the 6-week rotation, the groups were re-evaluated by a different arthritis educator. A group of 21 rheumatologists was also asked to perform a comprehensive musculoskeletal examination on individual arthritis educators. The arthritis educators assessed the examination of the rheumatologists using the same evaluation instrument that was used to assess the residents. RESULTS: Initially, internal medicine residents carried out the musculoskeletal examination poorly (34.2 +/- 0.09% correct, n = 27). By contrast, the rheumatologists carried out a significantly greater amount of the examination correctly (54.5 +/- 0.05%). The musculoskeletal examination skills of the residents who received additional training from an arthritis educator were significantly greater at the end of the rotation than the group who did not receive this intervention (50.5 +/- 0.10% versus 41.9 +/- 0.14% correct, P = 2.15 x 10(-5). CONCLUSION: Internal medicine residents carried out the musculoskeletal examination poorly. However, an intervention by arthritis educators improved the musculoskeletal examination skills of internal medicine residents significantly and more effectively than the standard clinical teaching in a rheumatology outpatient clinic. The impact of the arthritis educator intervention persisted for at least 5 weeks.
Authors: Michael J Battistone; Andrea M Barker; J Peter Beck; Robert Z Tashjian; Grant W Cannon Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 2.463