Literature DB >> 10512659

Differences in prey selection and behaviour during self-feeding and chick provisioning in rhinoceros auklets.

.   

Abstract

We determined whether a marine diving bird, the rhinoceros auklet, Cerorhinca monocerata, used different foraging behaviour and collected different prey items for its young than when feeding itself. Foraging behaviour was determined by conducting visual scans, and prey items were sampled by collecting fish delivered to chicks and by collecting fish where auklets were self-feeding, which was verified by two other sources of information. Adult auklets ate small fish (59.1+/-0.5 mm, N=547), including juvenile Pacific sand lance, Ammodytes hexapterus, and Pacific herring, Clupea harengus, but collected larger fish to feed their chicks (95.2+/-1.3 mm, N=321), including primarily Pacific sand lance, Pacific herring, Pacific salmon species, Oncorhynchus spp., and surf smelt, Hypomesus pretiosus. In addition, auklets collected fish for themselves primarily by diving in mixed-species feeding flocks before 1600 hours, whereas they collected fish to feed their chicks by diving solitarily after 1600 hours. This suggests that auklets switched both foraging behaviour and prey selection when collecting fish for self-feeding, compared with when collecting fish for chick provisioning. Several avian studies have documented different diets of adults and chicks, but this is the first research to observe directly and document different foraging behaviour used in adult and chick provisioning. We emphasize the importance of distinguishing between self-feeding and chick provisioning in foraging and life history studies. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10512659     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  13 in total

1.  Functional responses of the rough-legged buzzard in a multi-prey system.

Authors:  P Hellström; J Nyström; A Angerbjörn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Size-biased allocation of prey from male to offspring via female: family conflicts, prey selection, and evolution of sexual size dimorphism in raptors.

Authors:  Geir A Sonerud; Ronny Steen; Line M Løw; Line T Røed; Kristin Skar; Vidar Selås; Tore Slagsvold
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  A junk-food hypothesis for gannets feeding on fishery waste.

Authors:  David Grémillet; Lorien Pichegru; Grégoire Kuntz; Anthony G Woakes; Sarah Wilkinson; Robert J M Crawford; Peter G Ryan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Top 10 principles for designing healthy coastal ecosystems like the Salish Sea.

Authors:  Joseph K Gaydos; Leslie Dierauf; Grant Kirby; Deborah Brosnan; Kirsten Gilardi; Gary E Davis
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.184

5.  From puffins to plankton: a DNA-based analysis of a seabird food chain in the northern Gulf of Maine.

Authors:  A Kirsten Bowser; Antony W Diamond; Jason A Addison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Modelling foraging movements of diving predators: a theoretical study exploring the effect of heterogeneous landscapes on foraging efficiency.

Authors:  Marianna Chimienti; Kamil A Bartoń; Beth E Scott; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Simultaneous DNA-based diet analysis of breeding, non-breeding and chick Adélie penguins.

Authors:  Julie C McInnes; Louise Emmerson; Colin Southwell; Cassandra Faux; Simon N Jarman
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Modelling the effects of prey size and distribution on prey capture rates of two sympatric marine predators.

Authors:  Chris B Thaxter; Francis Daunt; David Grémillet; Mike P Harris; Silvano Benvenuti; Yutaka Watanuki; Keith C Hamer; Sarah Wanless
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Foraging flexibility and search patterns are unlinked during breeding in a free-ranging seabird.

Authors:  Akiko Shoji; Stéphane Aris-Brosou; Ellie Owen; Mark Bolton; Dave Boyle; Annette Fayet; Ben Dean; Holly Kirk; Robin Freeman; Chris Perrins; Tim Guilford
Journal:  Mar Biol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.573

10.  Foraging plasticity in seabirds: A non-invasive study of the diet of greater crested terns breeding in the Benguela region.

Authors:  Davide Gaglio; Timothée R Cook; Alistair McInnes; Richard B Sherley; Peter G Ryan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.