OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of a simplified inventory procedure for assessing nutrient intake from vitamin and mineral supplements. DESIGN: Participants brought their supplements to a clinic. An interviewer conducted the supplement inventory procedure, which consisted of recording data on the type of multiple vitamin and single supplements used. For the multiple vitamins, the interviewer recorded the exact dose for a subset of nutrients (vitamin C, calcium, selenium). For other nutrients, we imputed the dose in multiple vitamins. The dose of all single supplements was recorded. Labels of the supplements were photocopied and we transcribed the exact nutrient label data for the criterion measure. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess precision of nutrient intakes from the simplified inventory compared to the criterion measure. SETTING/ SUBJECTS: Data are from 104 adult vitamin supplement users in Washington state. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between nutrient intake estimated from the simplified inventory compared to the criterion measure were high (0.8-1.0) for those nutrients (vitamin C, calcium, selenium) for which the interviewer recorded the exact dose contained in multiple vitamins. However, for nutrients for which imputations were made regarding dose in multiple vitamins, correlation coefficients ranged from good (0.8 for vitamin E) to poor (0.3 for iron). CONCLUSIONS: The simplified inventory is rapid (4-5 min) and practical for large-scale studies. The precision of nutrient estimates using this procedure was variable, although excellent for the subset of nutrients for which the dose was recorded exactly. This study illustrates many of the challenges of collecting high quality supplement data.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of a simplified inventory procedure for assessing nutrient intake from vitamin and mineral supplements. DESIGN:Participants brought their supplements to a clinic. An interviewer conducted the supplement inventory procedure, which consisted of recording data on the type of multiple vitamin and single supplements used. For the multiple vitamins, the interviewer recorded the exact dose for a subset of nutrients (vitamin C, calcium, selenium). For other nutrients, we imputed the dose in multiple vitamins. The dose of all single supplements was recorded. Labels of the supplements were photocopied and we transcribed the exact nutrient label data for the criterion measure. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess precision of nutrient intakes from the simplified inventory compared to the criterion measure. SETTING/ SUBJECTS: Data are from 104 adult vitamin supplement users in Washington state. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between nutrient intake estimated from the simplified inventory compared to the criterion measure were high (0.8-1.0) for those nutrients (vitamin C, calcium, selenium) for which the interviewer recorded the exact dose contained in multiple vitamins. However, for nutrients for which imputations were made regarding dose in multiple vitamins, correlation coefficients ranged from good (0.8 for vitamin E) to poor (0.3 for iron). CONCLUSIONS: The simplified inventory is rapid (4-5 min) and practical for large-scale studies. The precision of nutrient estimates using this procedure was variable, although excellent for the subset of nutrients for which the dose was recorded exactly. This study illustrates many of the challenges of collecting high quality supplement data.
Authors: Judith Wylie-Rosett; Aaron K Aragaki; Barbara Cochrane; Michael G Perri; Milagros C Rosal; Stephen R Rapp Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Date: 2010 Oct-Dec
Authors: Erin S LeBlanc; Haley Hedlin; FeiFei Qin; Manisha Desai; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Nancy Perrin; JoAnn E Manson; Karen C Johnson; Kamal Masaki; Frances A Tylavsky; Marcia L Stefanick Journal: Maturitas Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Melissa A Kluczynski; Michael J Lamonte; Julie A Mares; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Ashley Wilder Smith; Corinne D Engelman; Christopher A Andrews; Linda G Snetselaar; Gloria E Sarto; Amy E Millen Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Marian L Neuhouser; JoAnn E Manson; Amy Millen; Mary Pettinger; Karen Margolis; Elizabeth T Jacobs; James M Shikany; Mara Vitolins; Lucile Adams-Campbell; Simin Liu; Erin LeBlanc; Karen C Johnson; Jean Wactawski-Wende Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jeannette M Beasley; Andrea Z LaCroix; Marian L Neuhouser; Ying Huang; Lesley Tinker; Nancy Woods; Yvonne Michael; J David Curb; Ross L Prentice Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Amy E Millen; Rick Voland; Sherie A Sondel; Niyati Parekh; Ronald L Horst; Robert B Wallace; Gregory S Hageman; Rick Chappell; Barbara A Blodi; Michael L Klein; Karen M Gehrs; Gloria E Sarto; Julie A Mares Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2011-04
Authors: Suzanne P Murphy; Lynne R Wilkens; Kristine R Monroe; Alana D Steffen; Kim M Yonemori; Yukiko Morimoto; Cheryl L Albright Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2011-07
Authors: Ting-Yuan David Cheng; Xiaoling Song; Shirley A A Beresford; Gloria Y F Ho; Karen C Johnson; Mridul Datta; Rowan T Chlebowski; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Lihong Qi; Marian L Neuhouser Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 2.506