Literature DB >> 10512545

Human auditory fast and slow omitted stimulus potentials and steady-state responses.

S Karamürsel1, T H Bullock.   

Abstract

Two kinds of omitted stimulus potentials (OSP) are called "fast" and 'slow." Fast OSPs, recently found with visual stimuli, are here extended to auditory; they occur after omissions or after the end of trains of 1 to > 20 Hz clicks. Slow OSPs, long known, follow trains of 0.3 to 4 Hz. Each has its constant peak latency after the due-time of the first missing stimulus, as though the system is expecting something quite accurately on schedule. They differ in dynamics and slow OSPs require the subject to attend; fast OSPs do not. Steady-state responses (SSR) at a critical click rate of 6-7 Hz sometimes appear to alternate between two forms and OSPs may depend on which they follow. Fast OSPs can occur to the first, second and even the third omissions after the end of a train. Short conditioning periods suffice. Irregular interstimulus intervals do not reduce fast OSPs but attenuate slow OSPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10512545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neurosci        ISSN: 0020-7454            Impact factor:   2.292


  5 in total

1.  Acute dose of alcohol affects cognitive components of reaction time to an omitted stimulus: differences among sensory systems.

Authors:  Oscar H Hernández; Muriel Vogel-Sprott; Teresita C Huchín-Ramirez; Fernando Aké-Estrada
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Electrical potentials indicate stimulus expectancy in the brains of ants and bees.

Authors:  Fidel Ramón; Wulfila Gronenberg
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.046

3.  Sensitivity to the temporal structure of rapid sound sequences - An MEG study.

Authors:  Lefkothea-Vasiliki Andreou; Timothy D Griffiths; Maria Chait
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A generic deviance detection principle for cortical On/Off responses, omission response, and mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Vincent S C Chien; Burkhard Maess; Thomas R Knösche
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Two different mechanisms for the detection of stimulus omission.

Authors:  Shogo Ohmae; Masaki Tanaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.