Literature DB >> 10512268

Percutaneous tracheostomy: a clinical comparison of dilatational (Ciaglia) and translaryngeal (Fantoni) techniques.

K Westphal1, C Byhahn, H J Wilke, V Lischke.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A number of percutaneous procedures for tracheostomy have been established within the last few years, among them a new technique by Fantoni using a translaryngeal approach for cannula placement. To compare the new translaryngeal tracheostomy (TLT) to the common percutaneous dilatational technique (PDT), we prospectively studied 90 patients who required elective tracheostomy. Tracheostomy was performed according to either the Ciaglia or the Fantoni technique in 45 patients at bedside. The overall complication rate was 11.1% (n = 5) in PDT, including aspiration of blood (n = 4) and severe bleeding requiring surgical intervention (n = 1). During TLT, there were technical difficulties involving guidewire placement in 31.1% (n = 14), and one patient required conversion to PDT. No other complications were noted in TLT. Regardless of the technique used, the postoperative PaO2/FIO2 ratio was slightly lower than preoperatively (P was not significant). When PDT and TLT were compared, the postoperative PaO2/FIO2 ratio was significantly lower in PDT than in TLT (P < 0.05), whereas the preoperative levels did not vary significantly between PDT and TLT. During TLT, the PaCO2 increased significantly, whereas it remained stable throughout PDT. No infection of the tracheostoma was noted in either the PDT or the TLT. We therefore consider both the PDT and the TLT equally safe and attractive techniques for establishing long-term airway access in critically ill patients. IMPLICATIONS: Elective tracheostomy is a widely accepted procedure for gaining long-term airway access. Two techniques for percutaneous tracheostomy-the established Ciaglia method and the new translaryngeal Fantoni technique-were prospectively studied for perioperative complications and practicability in 90 critically ill-patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10512268     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199910000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

1.  Learning curve in performing translaryngeal tracheostomy.

Authors:  Edoardo Zamponi; Silvio Zanaboni; Carlo Maestrone; Francesco Della Corte; Giuliano Pelosi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Percutaneous techniques versus surgical techniques for tracheostomy.

Authors:  Patrick Brass; Martin Hellmich; Angelika Ladra; Jürgen Ladra; Anna Wrzosek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-20

Review 3.  Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anthony Delaney; Sean M Bagshaw; Marek Nalos
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy: which technique is the best for the critically ill patient, and how can we gather further scientific evidence?

Authors:  Ansgar Brambrink
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Suspension laryngoscopy-assisted percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a safe method in COVID-19.

Authors:  Franco Parmigiani; Antonello Alberto Sala; Cristiana Fumanti; Andrea Luigi Rescaldani; Federico Giuseppe Quarta; Stefano Carlo Paradisi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.

Authors:  Young-Jae Cho
Journal:  Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul)       Date:  2012-03-31

7.  Modified translaryngeal tracheostomy for ventilator-dependent cardiac patients: A pilot of nonrandomized study.

Authors:  Touraj Babaee; Ali Sadeghpour Tabaei; Jalal Moludi; Seyyed Mostafa Alavi; Sepehr Sadeghpour Tabaei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.