Literature DB >> 10511673

A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition.

R S Croft, P H Buschang, J D English, R Meyer.   

Abstract

This study describes combined treatment and posttreatment effects for patients treated with the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition followed by retention with a prefabricated positioner. The sample included 24 female and 16 male patients with Class II malocclusions. Posttreatment lateral cephalograms were taken an average of 17 months after Herbst removal, when the patients presented for phase II comprehensive orthodontics. The cumulative treatment and retention effects were compared with a sample of untreated Class II controls matched for age, sex, and mandibular plane angle. The overjet and molar relationship were corrected by 3. 4 and 3.3 mm, respectively. A headgear effect of Herbst therapy was observed, as anterior maxillary displacement was reduced by 1.2 mm. Condylar growth was redirected to produce 2.0 mm greater posterior growth in the treatment group. These effects produced significantly greater decreases in SNA (0.8 degrees ) and ANB (1.4 degrees ), and a tendency toward an increase in SNB (0.5 degrees ) Mandibular orthopedic effects resulted in an increase in anterior facial height (1.6 mm) and inferior displacement of the chin. Minimal changes in the displacement of condylion in relation to stable cranial base structures suggest that glenoid fossa displacement does not contribute in a clinically significant way to Class II correction. Pretreatment, immediate posttreatment, and postretention corrected temporomandibular joint tomograms demonstrated a tendency for the condyle to be slightly forward (0.2 mm) at the end of treatment and then to fall back after treatment. Statistically significant joint space changes were limited to the posttreatment period. We conclude that Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition, in combination with retention, produces significant long-term improvements in dental and skeletal relationships as a result of dentoalveolar changes and orthopedic effects in both jaws.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10511673     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70230-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  10 in total

Review 1.  Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vasileios F Zymperdikas; Vasiliki Koretsi; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Moschos A Papadopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Mandibular fossa morphology during therapy with a fixed functional orthodontic appliance : A magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Jan Hourfar; Cornelia Kober; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Tomographic evaluation of dentoskeletal changes due to the treatment of class II malocclusion with Forsus appliance.

Authors:  Antonio Carlos Sakuno; Ana Paula Barbisan da Rosa; Fernando Akio Maeda; Tarcila Trivino; Paulo Eduardo Guedes Carvalho; Fernando César Torres
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-06-05

4.  Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients.

Authors:  Dean A Heinrichs; Imad Shammaa; Chris Martin; Thomas Razmus; Erdogan Gunel; Peter Ngan
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.750

5.  What effect does functional appliance treatment have on the temporomandibular joint? A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karma Shiba Kyburz; Theodore Eliades; Spyridon N Papageorgiou
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.750

6.  Effects of Class II division 1 malocclusion treatment with three types of fixed functional appliances.

Authors:  Deborah Brindeiro de Araújo Brito; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Camilla Foncatti Fiedler; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-11-11

7.  Prospective study of dentoskeletal changes in Class II division malocclusion treatment with twin force bite corrector.

Authors:  Carlos Henrique Guimarães; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Guilherme Janson; Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Janine Araki; Rodrigo Hermont Cançado; Renata Castro; Ravindra Nanda
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Analysis of Criteria for MRI Diagnosis of TMJ Disc Displacement and Arthralgia.

Authors:  Jeffry R Shaefer; Cara Joy Riley; Paul Caruso; David Keith
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-12-09

9.  Cone beam computed tomography study of apical root resorption induced by Herbst appliance.

Authors:  João Paulo Schwartz; Taísa Boamorte Raveli; Kélei Cristina de Mathias Almeida; Humberto Osvaldo Schwartz-Filho; Dirceu Barnabé Raveli
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Influence of Vertical Facial Growth Pattern on Herbst Appliance Effects in Prepubertal Patients: A Retrospective Controlled Study.

Authors:  Maria Rita Giuca; Marco Pasini; Sara Drago; Leonardo Del Corso; Arianna Vanni; Elisabetta Carli; Antonio Manni
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-01-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.