Literature DB >> 10511646

Safety of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography: A prospective experience of 4,033 consecutive studies.

W Mathias1, A Arruda, F C Santos, A L Arruda, E Mattos, A Osório, O Campos, M Gil, J L Andrade, A C Carvalho.   

Abstract

Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DASE) is an established method and has been shown to be accurate for the detection of coronary artery disease. Still, there are few large clinical studies that analyze the safety of DASE in general or the safety of performing it on an ambulatory basis. Most studies use a target heart rate as the primary end point regardless of whether asymptomatic ischemia occurs. Such studies have shown a serious cardiac event rate of approximately 0.3%. We prospectively studied 4,033 consecutive patients on an ambulatory basis and in the hospital with the use of DASE from July 1991 to December 1998. All tests were performed by an experienced physician, and all clinical and DASE data were stored in a large database organized at the beginning of the study. Dobutamine was infused in scalar doses of 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 microg/kg per minute in 3-minute stages. Development of a new wall motion abnormality, achievement of 85% of target heart, and end of the DASE infusion protocol were used as an end point. If 85% of the target heart rate was not achieved, atropine was infused up to 1 mg in the absence of myocardial ischemia, which was used in 1,280 studies. There were 3,645 diagnostic tests, and 388 (10%) were found to be nondiagnostic. This result was due to poor image quality in 115 (3%), end of protocol in negative-submaximal examinations in 124 (3%), and limiting side effects in 149 (4%). Thirty-seven percent of the tests showed positive results for myocardial ischemia. Major test-related cardiac complications occurred in 10 (0.25%) patients and included 1 ventricular fibrillation, 1 case of myocardial infarction, and 8 cases of sustained ventricular tachycardia. Atropine poisoning was observed in 5 (0.12%) patients. No deaths occurred as a direct or indirect consequence of DASE. We conclude that dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography is a reasonably safe method for detection of coronary artery disease in the hospital or in an ambulatory basis. The use of new wall motion abnormality as 1 of the end points may prevent further ischemia-related complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10511646     DOI: 10.1016/s0894-7317(99)70182-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  21 in total

Review 1.  Serious and potentially life threatening complications of cardiac stress testing: Physiological mechanisms and management strategies.

Authors:  Vasken Dilsizian; Henry Gewirtz; Nicholas Paivanas; Anastasia N Kitsiou; Fadi G Hage; Nathan E Crone; Ronald G Schwartz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of myocardial viability in patients with left ventricular dysfunction taking beta blockers: accuracy and optimal dose.

Authors:  T Zaglavara; R Haaverstad; B Cumberledge; T Irvine; H Karvounis; G Parharidis; G Louridas; A Kenny
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Safety and cardiac chronotropic responsiveness to the early injection of atropine during dobutamine stress echocardiography in the elderly.

Authors:  J M Tsutsui; F Cerqueira Lario; D R Fernandes; I Kowatsch; J C Sbano; J A Franchini Ramires; W Mathias
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  3rd Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Danielle Menosi Gualandro; Pai Ching Yu; Bruno Caramelli; André Coelho Marques; Daniela Calderaro; Luciana Savoy Fornari; Claudio Pinho; Alina Coutinho Rodrigues Feitosa; Carisi Anne Polanczyk; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Carlos Jardim; Carolina L Z Vieira; Debora Y M Nakamura; Denise Iezzi; Dirk Schreen; Eduardo Leal Adam; Elbio Antonio D'Amico; Emerson Q de Lima; Emmanuel de Almeida Burdmann; Enrique Indalecio Pachón Mateo; Fabiana Goulart Marcondes Braga; Fabio S Machado; Flavio J de Paula; Gabriel Assis Lopes do Carmo; Gilson Soares Feitosa-Filho; Gustavo Faibischew Prado; Heno Ferreira Lopes; João R C Fernandes; José J G de Lima; Luciana Sacilotto; Luciano Ferreira Drager; Luciano Janussi Vacanti; Luis Eduardo Paim Rohde; Luis F L Prada; Luis Henrique Wolff Gowdak; Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira; Maristela Camargo Monachini; Milena Frota Macatrão-Costa; Milena Ribeiro Paixão; Mucio Tavares de Oliveira; Patricia Cury; Paula R Villaça; Pedro Silvio Farsky; Rinaldo F Siciliano; Roberto Henrique Heinisch; Rogerio Souza; Sandra F M Gualandro; Tarso Augusto Duenhas Accorsi; Wilson Mathias
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.000

5. 

Authors:  André Arpad Faludi; Maria Cristina de Oliveira Izar; José Francisco Kerr Saraiva; Ana Paula Marte Chacra; Henrique Tria Bianco; Abrahão Afiune; Adriana Bertolami; Alexandre C Pereira; Ana Maria Lottenberg; Andrei C Sposito; Antonio Carlos Palandri Chagas; Antonio Casella; Antônio Felipe Simão; Aristóteles Comte de Alencar; Bruno Caramelli; Carlos Costa Magalhães; Carlos Eduardo Negrão; Carlos Eduardo Dos Santos Ferreira; Carlos Scherr; Claudine Maria Alves Feio; Cristiane Kovacs; Daniel Branco de Araújo; Daniel Magnoni; Daniela Calderaro; Danielle Menosi Gualandro; Edgard Pessoa de Mello; Elizabeth Regina Giunco Alexandre; Emília Inoue Sato; Emilio Hideyuki Moriguchi; Fabiana Hanna Rached; Fábio César Dos Santos; Fernando Henpin Yue Cesena; Francisco Antonio Helfenstein Fonseca; Henrique Andrade Rodrigues da Fonseca; Hermes Toros Xavier; Isabela Cardoso Pimentel Mota; Isabela de Carlos Back Giuliano; Jaqueline Scholz Issa; Jayme Diament; João Bosco Pesquero; José Ernesto Dos Santos; José Rocha Faria; José Xavier de Melo; Juliana Tieko Kato; Kerginaldo Paulo Torres; Marcelo Chiara Bertolami; Marcelo Heitor Vieira Assad; Márcio Hiroshi Miname; Marileia Scartezini; Neusa Assumpta Forti; Otávio Rizzi Coelho; Raul Cavalcante Maranhão; Raul Dias Dos Santos; Renato Jorge Alves; Roberta Lara Cassani; Roberto Tadeu Barcellos Betti; Tales de Carvalho; Tânia Leme da Rocha Martinez; Viviane Zorzanelli Rocha Giraldez; Wilson Salgado
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 6.  Dobutamine stress echocardiography: safety in diagnosing coronary artery disease.

Authors:  F Lattanzi; E Picano; E Adamo; A Varga
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Typical blood pressure response during dobutamine stress echocardiography of patients without known cardiovascular disease who have normal stress echocardiograms.

Authors:  Sara Abram; Adelaide M Arruda-Olson; Christopher G Scott; Patricia A Pellikka; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Jae K Oh; Alberto Milan; Robert B McCully
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 8.  Cardiac disease in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Jeremy A Falk; Steven Kadiev; Gerard J Criner; Steven M Scharf; Omar A Minai; Philip Diaz
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-05-01

9.  Imaging the physiology of the ischemic cascade: are 2 tools better than 1?

Authors:  Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  Reduced adverse effects with an accelerated dobutamine stress protocol compared with the conventional protocol: a prospective, randomized myocardial perfusion scintigraphy study.

Authors:  Ronaldo de Souza Leão Lima; Andrea De Lorenzo; Aurora Issa
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.