OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of several drug delivery patterns of methylphenidate and to determine whether acute tolerance develops to this widely used stimulant medication in the treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. METHODS: Double-blind trials were conducted in a laboratory school setting in which multiple measures of efficacy were obtained frequently in the morning and afternoon across the school day. In study I, relative efficacy was determined for three dosing patterns of methylphenidate: a standard twice-daily profile, a flat profile, and an ascending profile. In study II, tolerance was assessed by comparison of three-times-a-day regimens in which the time of the middle dose varied. RESULTS: In study I, the efficacy of the ascending treatment increased across the day, and in the afternoon it was equal to the efficacy of the twice-daily treatment, indicating that an initial bolus was not required for efficacy. The efficacy of the flat treatment declined across the day, and in the afternoon it was significantly less than in the twice-daily treatment, suggesting that tolerance may be developing. In study II, acute improvements in efficacy were reduced to the second of two closely spaced but not to two widely spaced bolus doses, suggesting that shortly after exposure to high concentrations, efficacy is reduced to given concentrations of methylphenidate. In a concentration-effect model, a tolerance term was needed to account for counterclockwise hysteresis. CONCLUSIONS:Acute tolerance to methylphenidate appears to exist. This should be considered in the design of an optimal dosing regimen for the treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of several drug delivery patterns of methylphenidate and to determine whether acute tolerance develops to this widely used stimulant medication in the treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. METHODS: Double-blind trials were conducted in a laboratory school setting in which multiple measures of efficacy were obtained frequently in the morning and afternoon across the school day. In study I, relative efficacy was determined for three dosing patterns of methylphenidate: a standard twice-daily profile, a flat profile, and an ascending profile. In study II, tolerance was assessed by comparison of three-times-a-day regimens in which the time of the middle dose varied. RESULTS: In study I, the efficacy of the ascending treatment increased across the day, and in the afternoon it was equal to the efficacy of the twice-daily treatment, indicating that an initial bolus was not required for efficacy. The efficacy of the flat treatment declined across the day, and in the afternoon it was significantly less than in the twice-daily treatment, suggesting that tolerance may be developing. In study II, acute improvements in efficacy were reduced to the second of two closely spaced but not to two widely spaced bolus doses, suggesting that shortly after exposure to high concentrations, efficacy is reduced to given concentrations of methylphenidate. In a concentration-effect model, a tolerance term was needed to account for counterclockwise hysteresis. CONCLUSIONS: Acute tolerance to methylphenidate appears to exist. This should be considered in the design of an optimal dosing regimen for the treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Authors: Mei-Ling Chen; Vinod P Shah; Derek Ganes; Kamal K Midha; James Caro; Prabu Nambiar; Mario L Rocci; Avinash G Thombre; Bertil Abrahamsson; Dale Conner; Barbara Davit; Paul Fackler; Colm Farrell; Suneel Gupta; Russell Katz; Mehul Mehta; Sheldon H Preskorn; Gerard Sanderink; Salomon Stavchansky; Robert Temple; Yaning Wang; Helen Winkle; Lawrence Yu Journal: AAPS J Date: 2010-05-04 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: John S Markowitz; Arthur B Straughn; Kennerly S Patrick; C Lindsay DeVane; Linda Pestreich; James Lee; Yanfeng Wang; Rafael Muniz Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2003 Impact factor: 6.447