Literature DB >> 10510897

Potentially lethal damage repair by total and quiescent tumor cells following various DNA-damaging treatments.

S Masunaga1, K Ono, H Hori, M Suzuki, Y Kinashi, M Takagaki, S Kasai, H Nagasawa, Y Uto.   

Abstract

After continuous labeling of proliferating (P) cells with 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) for 5 days, SCC VII tumor-bearing mice received various kinds of DNA-damaging treatments: gamma-ray irradiation, tirapazamine (TPZ, hypoxia-specific cytotoxin) administration, or cisplatin injection. From 0.5 to 72 hr after treatment, tumors were excised, minced, and trypsinized. Single tumor cell suspensions were incubated for 48 hr with a cytokinesis-blocker, cytochalasin-B. Then, the micronucleus (MN) frequency for BrdU-unlabeled cells, quiescent (Q) cells at treatment, was determined using immunofluorescence staining for BrdU. The MN frequency for total (P+Q) cells was obtained from tumors that were not pretreated with BrdU labeling. The sensitivity to each DNA-damaging treatment was evaluated in terms of the frequency of induced micronuclei in binuclear tumor cells (MN frequency). Treatment with gamma-rays or cisplatin resulted in a larger MN frequency in total cells than in Q cells. In contrast, TPZ treatment produced a smaller MN frequency in total cells than in Q cells. Regardless of the treatment used, Q cells showed greater repair capacities than total cells. However, TPZ caused much smaller repair capacity in both total and Q cells, compared with gamma-rays or cisplatin. Gamma-rays and cisplatin produced similar repair patterns. Differences in sensitivity between total and Q cells and repair patterns of the two cell populations were thought to depend on differences between the two cell populations in the toxicity of the DNA-damaging treatment and distribution pattern of the anticancer agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10510897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Med        ISSN: 0288-2043


  6 in total

1.  A model of quiescent tumour microregions for evaluating multicellular resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs.

Authors:  H R Mellor; D J P Ferguson; R Callaghan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Prediction of Response to Temozolomide in Low-Grade Glioma Patients Based on Tumor Size Dynamics and Genetic Characteristics.

Authors:  P Mazzocco; C Barthélémy; G Kaloshi; M Lavielle; D Ricard; A Idbaih; D Psimaras; M-A Renard; A Alentorn; J Honnorat; J-Y Delattre; F Ducray; B Ribba
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-10

Review 3.  Chemotherapeutic Drugs: DNA Damage and Repair in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Laura Annovazzi; Marta Mellai; Davide Schiffer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Changes in the sensitivity of intratumor cells during fractionated tirapazamine administration.

Authors:  S Masunaga; K Ono; M Suzuki; Y Kinashi; M Takagaki; S Kasai; H Nagasawa; Y Uto; H Hori
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  2000-07

5.  An attempt to improve the therapeutic effect of boron neutron capture therapy using commonly employed 10B-carriers based on analytical studies on the correlation among quiescent tumor cell characteristics, tumor heterogeneity and cancer stemness.

Authors:  Shin-Ichiro Masunaga; Yu Sanada; Keizo Tano; Yoshinori Sakurai; Hiroki Tanaka; Takushi Takata; Minoru Suzuki; Koji Ono
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Essential gene pathways for glioblastoma stem cells: clinical implications for prevention of tumor recurrence.

Authors:  Kazunari Yamada; Jonathan Tso; Fei Ye; Jinny Choe; Yue Liu; Linda M Liau; Cho-Lea Tso
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.