C J Bates1, A Prentice, S Finch. 1. MRC Human Nutrition Research, Cambridge, UK. Chris.Bates@mrc-hnr.cam.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the patterns and possible explanations for gender differences in food choices, nutrient intakes and status indices, especially for micronutrients, in a representative sample of older people living in Britain, who participated in the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of people aged 65 y and over during 1994-95. DESIGN: The Survey procedures included a health-and-lifestyle interview, a four-day weighed diet record, anthropometric measurements and a fasting blood sample for biochemical indices. SETTING: Eighty randomly-selected postcode sectors from mainland Britain. SUBJECTS: Of 1556 older people not living in institutions who were interviewed, 80% agreed to provide a complete four-day diet record and 63% agreed to give a blood sample for status index measurements. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN RESULT: The most highly significant gender differences in food choices were that women ate more butter, full-fat milk and certain beverages, cakes, apples, pears and bananas, whereas men ate more eggs, sugar, certain meat products and drank more alcoholic drinks, especially beer and lager. When adjusted for energy intakes, the younger women (65-79 y) had higher intakes than the younger men, of fat, retinol, vitamin C and calcium. The older women (80+ y) had higher intakes than older men, of fat and vitamin E, but lower intakes of protein, zinc and beta-carotene. The younger women had better status indices than the younger men: for alpha- and beta-carotenes, beta-cryptoxanthin and vitamin C. Women had higher plasma concentrations of cholesterol and HDL cholesterol, phosphate and copper, but lower indices of iron and vitamin D status, than men. These gender differences in status were not altered by inclusion of the corresponding nutrient intakes in the model. CONCLUSIONS: There are gender differences in food choices, in energy and nutrient intakes and in nutritional blood status indices in older British people, especially those aged 65-79 y. Some of the status differences are attenuated in the age group of 80 y and older, whereas others are enhanced. The relationships between the quantity and type of foods or nutrients consumed, and nutrient status, are complex. With respect to suspected risk and protective factors for vascular disease, women aged 65-79 y had significantly better status for plasma alpha- and beta-carotene, ascorbate, HDL-cholesterol and homocysteine; but, in contrast, they had lower blood haemoglobin concentrations and higher concentrations of total and non-HDL-cholesterol.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the patterns and possible explanations for gender differences in food choices, nutrient intakes and status indices, especially for micronutrients, in a representative sample of older people living in Britain, who participated in the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of people aged 65 y and over during 1994-95. DESIGN: The Survey procedures included a health-and-lifestyle interview, a four-day weighed diet record, anthropometric measurements and a fasting blood sample for biochemical indices. SETTING: Eighty randomly-selected postcode sectors from mainland Britain. SUBJECTS: Of 1556 older people not living in institutions who were interviewed, 80% agreed to provide a complete four-day diet record and 63% agreed to give a blood sample for status index measurements. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN RESULT: The most highly significant gender differences in food choices were that women ate more butter, full-fat milk and certain beverages, cakes, apples, pears and bananas, whereas men ate more eggs, sugar, certain meat products and drank more alcoholic drinks, especially beer and lager. When adjusted for energy intakes, the younger women (65-79 y) had higher intakes than the younger men, of fat, retinol, vitamin C and calcium. The older women (80+ y) had higher intakes than older men, of fat and vitamin E, but lower intakes of protein, zinc and beta-carotene. The younger women had better status indices than the younger men: for alpha- and beta-carotenes, beta-cryptoxanthin and vitamin C. Women had higher plasma concentrations of cholesterol and HDL cholesterol, phosphate and copper, but lower indices of iron and vitamin D status, than men. These gender differences in status were not altered by inclusion of the corresponding nutrient intakes in the model. CONCLUSIONS: There are gender differences in food choices, in energy and nutrient intakes and in nutritional blood status indices in older British people, especially those aged 65-79 y. Some of the status differences are attenuated in the age group of 80 y and older, whereas others are enhanced. The relationships between the quantity and type of foods or nutrients consumed, and nutrient status, are complex. With respect to suspected risk and protective factors for vascular disease, women aged 65-79 y had significantly better status for plasma alpha- and beta-carotene, ascorbate, HDL-cholesterol and homocysteine; but, in contrast, they had lower blood haemoglobin concentrations and higher concentrations of total and non-HDL-cholesterol.
Authors: S E Power; I B Jeffery; R P Ross; C Stanton; P W O'Toole; E M O'Connor; G F Fitzgerald Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Deniz Atalayer; Spiro P Pantazatos; Charlisa D Gibson; Haley McOuatt; Lauren Puma; Nerys M Astbury; Allan Geliebter Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Allan Geliebter; Spiro P Pantazatos; Haley McOuatt; Lauren Puma; Charlisa D Gibson; Deniz Atalayer Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: T M Puranen; S E Pietila; K H Pitkala; H Kautiainen; M Raivio; U Eloniemi-Sulkava; S K Jyvakorpi; M Suominen Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Sinéad Boylan; Ailsa Welch; Hynek Pikhart; Sofia Malyutina; Andrzej Pajak; Ruzena Kubinova; Oksana Bragina; Galina Simonova; Urszula Stepaniak; Aleksandra Gilis-Januszewska; Lubomíra Milla; Anne Peasey; Michael Marmot; Martin Bobak Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Andrea Nesbitt; Shannon Majowicz; Rita Finley; Frank Pollari; Katarina Pintar; Barbara Marshall; Angela Cook; Jan Sargeant; Jeff Wilson; Carl Ribble; Lewinda Knowles Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2008-10-24 Impact factor: 3.295