Literature DB >> 10509553

Factors related to quality of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in a pediatric population.

E Lurbe1, B Cremades, C Rodriguez, M I Torro, V Alvarez, J Redon.   

Abstract

To assess the factors related to the quality of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in a pediatric population, we performed 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitorings on 333 unselected children aged 3 to 18 years using a Spacelabs 90207 monitor. For each individual, the percentages of valid measurements (ratio between valid and total number of measurements, 76.4% +/-15.6%) and of successful measurements (percentage of valid preset measurements, 89.8% +/- 11.5%) were calculated. Two hundred eighty-one (84.1%) monitorings had a successful measurement rate of >80%. Two hundred thirteen (64%) were of excellent quality, as defined by the percentage of successful measurements being higher than or equal to 90%. Age (P < .0001) and 24-h systolic blood pressure (P < .04) were positively and independently associated (in multiple regression analysis) to the percentage of successful measurements, accounting for 8% of the variance. Furthermore, a significant negative correlation between causal pulse pressure and the number of erroneous measurements was observed (r = -0.18, P < .01). This study has shown that in a pediatric population, the quality of the monitoring depends only in part on age and ambulatory systolic blood pressure values when an oscillometric device is used. The results have demonstrated the important role pulse pressure amplitude plays when accounting for the number of erroneous measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10509553     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00076-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  7 in total

Review 1.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents: coming of age?

Authors:  Empar Lurbe; María Isabel Torró; Julio Alvarez
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Effect of placebo on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children.

Authors:  Karen Redwine; Lee Howard; Pippa Simpson; Shun-Hwa Li; Ke Yan; Laura James; Jeffrey Blumer; Janice Sullivan; Robert Ward; Thomas Wells
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 3.  Utility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents.

Authors:  John W Graves; Mohammed Mahdi Althaf
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in infants and toddlers.

Authors:  Natasa Marcun Varda; Alojz Gregoric
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Validation of the custo screen pediatric blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010.

Authors:  Beate Beime; Cornelia Deutsch; Ralf Krüger; Andreas Wolf; Peter Müller; Gertrud Hammel; Peter Bramlage
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring tolerability and blood pressure status in adolescents: the SHIP AHOY study.

Authors:  Gilad Hamdani; Joseph T Flynn; Stephen Daniels; Bonita Falkner; Coral Hanevold; Julie Ingelfinger; Marc B Lande; Lisa J Martin; Kevin E Meyers; Mark Mitsnefes; Bernard Rosner; Joshua Samuels; Elaine M Urbina
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 7.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a versatile tool for evaluating and managing hypertension in children.

Authors:  Alisa A Acosta; Karen L McNiece
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.714

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.