Literature DB >> 10509160

Vascular endothelial growth factor measured in platelet poor plasma allows optimal separation between cancer patients and volunteers: a key to study an angiogenic marker in vivo?

W Wynendaele1, R Derua, M F Hoylaerts, A Pawinski, E Waelkens, E A de Bruijn, R Paridaens, W Merlevede, A T van Oosterom.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Serum VEGF levels are elevated in cancer patients and are used as a tumor marker in different malignancies. We have measured VEGF levels in different blood compartments in cancer patients and healthy volunteers in order to assess the most suitable way of processing blood for measuring VEGF as a marker of tumor-angiogenesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: VEGF concentrations were analyzed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in serum (VEGFS), EDTA plasma (VEGFEDTA), citrated plasma (VEGFC), CTAD-plasma (VEGFCTAD), platelet poor plasma (VEGFPPP), platelet rich plasma after induction of platelet activation (VEGFPRP). Platelet activation was assessed by measuring PF4 concentrations in different plasma samples.
RESULTS: We observed higher VEGFS (P = 0.0027), VEGFEDTA (P = 0.003) and VEGFPPP (P = 0.0007) levels in cancer patients than in volunteers; VEGFPRP concentrations showed no significant difference (P = 0.208). Analysis of the correlation between VEGFplt and VEGFS in cancer patients showed a similar correlation in a comparable VEGFS concentration range as in the volunteers. When comparing VEGFC to VEGFCTAD, we find significantly higher VEGF and PF4 levels in citrated plasma (VEGF: P = 0.00019; PF4: P = 0.00023).
CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that VEGFS in cancer patients encompass platelet-delivered VEGF and VEGF from other sources, notably from (neo)-angiogenesis in tumoral tissue. The best discrimination between volunteers and cancer patients was observed in PPP. As generating plasma can induce platelet activation, with consequent VEGF release from platelets, we suggest that to assess free circulating VEGF, CTAD plasma should be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10509160     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008377921886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  18 in total

1.  Stability analysis of vascular endothelial growth factor in cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Stephen M Dombrowski; Abhishek Deshpande; Natalie Krajcir; Serge El-Khoury; Chandra Krishnan; Mark G Luciano
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.996

2.  Major abdominal surgery increases plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor: open more so than minimally invasive methods.

Authors:  Avraham Belizon; Emre Balik; Daniel L Feingold; Marc Bessler; Tracey D Arnell; Kenneth A Forde; Patrick K Horst; Suvinit Jain; Vesna Cekic; Irena Kirman; Richard L Whelan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Differential changes in platelet VEGF, Tsp, CXCL12, and CXCL4 in patients with metastatic cancer.

Authors:  Tina Wiesner; Stefanie Bugl; Frank Mayer; Jörg T Hartmann; Hans-Georg Kopp
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Clinical utility of certain biomarkers as predictors of breast cancer with or without metastasis among Egyptian females.

Authors:  Samia A Ahmed; Manal A Hamed; Omar S Omar
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-10-09

5.  Serum and plasma determination of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors yield different results: the need for standardization in clinical practice.

Authors:  Giovanna Oggè; Roberto Romero; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Zhong Dong; Pooja Mittal; Edi Vaisbuch; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Juan M Gonzalez; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2010-08

6.  Phase II study of thalidomide in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  G M Marx; N Pavlakis; S McCowatt; F M Boyle; J A Levi; D R Bell; R Cook; M Biggs; N Little; H R Wheeler
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of preanalytical factors and methodological differences influencing the measurement of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor.

Authors:  Ulrika Sjöbom; Anders K Nilsson; Hanna Gyllensten; Ann Hellström; Chatarina Löfqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Aqueous vascular endothelial growth factor as a predictor of macular thickening following cataract surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M Elizabeth Hartnett; Nicholas Tinkham; Lauren Paynter; Pete Geisen; Pinchas Rosenberg; Gary Koch; Kenneth L Cohen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Development of time-resolved immunofluorometric assays for vascular endothelial growth factor and application on plasma of patients with gastric tumours.

Authors:  S L Sheng; S H Bao; G Huang; L M Wang
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 10.  A critical review of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) analysis in peripheral blood: is the current literature meaningful?

Authors:  E Hormbrey; P Gillespie; K Turner; C Han; A Roberts; D McGrouther; A L Harris
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.