Literature DB >> 10508893

Tidal creek and salt marsh sediments in South Carolina coastal estuaries: II. Distribution of organic contaminants.

D M Sanger1, A F Holland, G I Scott.   

Abstract

Twenty-eight tidal creeks along the South Carolina coast were sampled during the summer of 1995 to determine the levels of sediment contamination including organic chemicals (i.e., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [PAHs], polychlorinated biphenyls [PCBs], and DDT and its metabolites) associated with different types and varying levels of watershed development (i.e., industrial/urban, suburban, forested, and salt marsh). Organic analysis utilized high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection and capillary gas chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry (GC-ITMS) for PAHs, and gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC-ECD) for pesticides and PCBs. Results indicated that creeks with industrial/urban watersheds had significantly higher concentrations of PAHs, PCBs, and DDT compared with creeks with suburban and forested (reference) watersheds. The suburban watershed class of creeks had concentrations of half the PAH analytes and the total PCBs which exceeded the concentrations found in the forested watershed class of creeks. The spatial distribution of organic contaminants was evaluated in four of these tidal creek-salt marsh systems representing urban/industrial, suburban, and forested watersheds, from the creek channel to the adjacent uplands. The distribution of organic contaminants within each representative creek was not concordant with the total organic carbon or the clay content of the sediment. The representative industrial/urban creek-marsh system, Diesel Creek, had the highest concentration of PAHs in the creek channel and the highest concentration of PCBs and DDT on the marsh surface, primarily in the upper portion of the system. The representative suburban creek-marsh system, Shem Creek, had elevated levels of both PAHs and PCBs throughout the entire system. This system also had one site with a total PAH concentration of 324,000 ppb and a total DDT concentration that was 20-100 times higher than the other sites. One of the representative forested creek-marsh systems, Rathall Creek, had low levels of the three organic contaminants except for one sampling site that had PAH concentrations a factor of 10 higher than the other sites. The other representative forested creek-marsh system, Long Creek, had low levels of PAHs and PCBs, but elevated levels of DDT were observed, particularly in the upper portion on the marsh surface. The results of this study suggest that (1) anthropogenic alteration of the land cover in the watersheds of tidal creek-salt marsh systems may increase the organic contaminant loadings in the sediment, and (2) tidal creek-salt marsh sediments, particularly in the creek channel, are repositories and potentially conduits of organic contaminants from the upland environment to the deeper estuarine areas.http://link.springer-ny. com/link/service/journals/00244/bibs/37n4p458.html</++ +HEA

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10508893     DOI: 10.1007/s002449900540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  13 in total

1.  The importance of considering spatial attributes in evaluating estuarine habitat condition: the South Carolina experience.

Authors:  Robert F Van Dolah; David E Chestnut; John D Jones; Pamela C Jutte; George Riekerk; Martin Levisen; William McDermott
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Land use effects on macrobenthic communities in southeastern United States tidal creeks.

Authors:  Travis Washburn; Denise Sanger
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Interactions of Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE) With Skeletal Muscle Ryanodine Receptor Type 1.

Authors:  Kim M Truong; Gennady Cherednichenko; Isaac N Pessah
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Seasonal variability of anthropogenic indices of PAHs in sediment from the Kuala Selangor River, west coast Peninsular Malaysia.

Authors:  Najat Masood; Normala Halimoon; Ahmad Zaharin Aris; Mohamad Pauzi Zakaria; Vahab Vaezzadeh; Sami M Magam; Shuhaimi Mustafa; Masni Mohd Ali; Mehrzad Keshavarzifard; Sadeq Abdullah Abdo Alkhadher; Chui Wei Bong; Murad Ali Alsalahi
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  An evaluation of contaminated estuarine sites using sediment quality guidelines and ecological assessment methodologies.

Authors:  M Fulton; P Key; E Wirth; A K Leight; J Daugomah; D Bearden; S Sivertsen; G Scott
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Cumulative impacts of dock shading on Spartina alterniflora in South Carolina estuaries.

Authors:  Denise M Sanger; A Frederick Holland; Christopher Gainey
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Limited Influence of Urban Stormwater Runoff on Salt Marsh Platform and Marsh Creek Oxygen Dynamics in Coastal Georgia.

Authors:  William B Savidge; Jonathan Brink; Jackson O Blanton
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Microbe-assisted phytoremediation of hydrocarbons in estuarine environments.

Authors:  Vanessa Oliveira; Newton C M Gomes; Adelaide Almeida; Artur M S Silva; Helena Silva; Ângela Cunha
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Evaluation of the impacts of dock structures and land use on tidal creek ecosystems in South Carolina estuarine environments.

Authors:  Denise M Sanger; A Fredrick Holland; Debra L Hernandez
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-03-23       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  PAH mineralization and bacterial organotolerance in surface sediments of the Charleston Harbor estuary.

Authors:  Michael T Montgomery; Thomas J Boyd; Christopher L Osburn; David C Smith
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.