Literature DB >> 10508620

The response to prism deviations in human infants.

P M Riddell1, A M Horwood, S M Houston, J E Turner.   

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that infants are unable to make a corrective eye movement in response to a small base-out prism placed in front of one eye before 14-16 weeks [1]. Three hypotheses have been proposed to explain this early inability, and each of these makes different predictions for the time of onset of a response to a larger prism. The first proposes that infants have a 'degraded sensory capacity' and so require a larger retinal disparity (difference in the position of the image on the retina of each eye) to stimulate disparity detectors [2]. This predicts that infants might respond at an earlier age than previously reported [1] when tested using a larger prism. The second hypothesis proposes that infants learn to respond to larger retinal disparities through practice with small disparities [3]. According to this theory, using a larger prism will not result in developmentally earlier responses, and may even delay the response. The third hypothesis proposes that the ability to respond to prismatic deviation depends on maturational factors indicated by the onset of stereopsis (the ability to detect depth in an image on the basis of retinal disparity cues only) [4] [5], predicting that the size of the prism is irrelevant. To differentiate between these hypotheses, we tested 192 infants ranging from 2 to 52 weeks of age using a larger prism. Results showed that 63% of infants of 5-8 weeks of age produced a corrective eye movement in response to placement of a prism in front of the eye when in the dark. Both the percentage of infants who produced a response, and the speed of the response, increased with age. These results suggest that infants can make corrective eye movements in response to large prismatic deviations before 14-16 weeks of age. This, in combination with other recent results [6], discounts previous hypotheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10508620     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80456-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  8 in total

1.  Development of visuomotor representations for hand movement in young children.

Authors:  José L Contreras-Vidal; Jin Bo; J Paul Boudreau; Jane E Clark
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Neonatal ocular misalignments reflect vergence development but rarely become esotropia.

Authors:  A Horwood
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  2016 International Orthoptic Congress Burian Lecture: Folklore or Evidence?

Authors:  Anna M Horwood
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2017-04-20

5.  Developmental changes in the balance of disparity, blur, and looming/proximity cues to drive ocular alignment and focus.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Sensitivity of vergence responses of 5- to 10-week-old human infants.

Authors:  Eric S Seemiller; Jingyun Wang; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Human infants can generate vergence responses to retinal disparity by 5 to 10 weeks of age.

Authors:  Eric S Seemiller; Bruce G Cumming; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Vergence Adaptation to Short-Duration Stimuli in Early Childhood.

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.799

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.