Literature DB >> 10507775

Enhanced prediction of breast cancer prognosis by evaluating expression of p53 and prostate-specific antigen in combination.

H Yu1, M A Levesque, G M Clark, E P Diamandis.   

Abstract

p53 gene mutation is the most common genetic alteration in neoplastic diseases, including breast cancer, for which p53 alteration may indicate poor prognosis. Recent clinical evidence suggests that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) expression may identify breast cancer patients with favourable outcome. Assessment of p53 and PSA in combination, potentially offering improved prediction, has not yet been performed. Extracts from 952 primary breast carcinomas were assayed for PSA and p53 by quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) developed by the authors. Concentrations of each marker were classified as negative or positive on the basis of median and 30th percentile cut-off points for p53 and PSA respectively. Patients followed for a median of 6 years having different combinations of negative or positive status for PSA and p53 were compared with respect to the relative risks (RRs) for relapse and death by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, in which an interaction term was also evaluated, and with respect to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) probabilities by Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests. Multivariate models were adjusted for oestrogen and progesterone receptor status, nodal status, patient age, tumour size, DNA ploidy, S phase fraction and receipt of chemotherapy. Interactions were not found between the status of PSA and p53 in the Cox models, in which PSA-negativity (RR = 1.47, P = 0.020 for DFS, and RR = 1.49, P = 0.023 for OS) and p53-positivity (RR = 1.46, P = 0.017 for DFS, and RR = 1.41, P = 0.033 for OS) were individually associated with prognosis. Evaluation of a combined three-level variable revealed that PSA(-)/p53(+) patients had significantly higher risks for relapse (RR = 2.13, P < 0.001) and death (RR = 2.08, P = 0.001) than PSA(+)/p53(-) patients, and that patients positive or negative for both markers had intermediate risks for the outcome events in the same multivariate analysis (RR = 1.45 for both DFS and OS). The results of our study demonstrate that the assessment of combined PSA and p53 expression status by ELISAs, easily applicable to breast tumour extracts prepared for steroid hormone receptor analyses, may stratify breast cancer patients into groups differing by relapse and death risks of greater magnitude than offered by the assessment of either p53 or PSA alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10507775      PMCID: PMC2362935          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  42 in total

1.  Immunofluorometric assay of p53 protein versus sequencing of p53 exons 5 to 9 for the detection of p53 abnormalities in ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  E S Lianidou; M A Levesque; D Katsaros; K Angelopoulou; H Yu; F Genta; R Arisio; M Massobrio; B Bharaj; E P Diamandis
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 2.  The regulation of p53 function: Steiner Award Lecture.

Authors:  D P Lane
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 3.  Cell cycle control and cancer.

Authors:  L H Hartwell; M B Kastan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.

Authors:  N Mantel
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1966-03

5.  Glandular kallikreins and prostate-specific antigen are expressed in the human endometrium.

Authors:  J Clements; A Mukhtar
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 6.  Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis.

Authors:  M S Greenblatt; W P Bennett; M Hollstein; C C Harris
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Biological effects of prostate specific antigen as an insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 protease.

Authors:  P Cohen; D M Peehl; H C Graves; R G Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  Immunoreactive prostate-specific antigen levels in female and male breast tumors and its association with steroid hormone receptors and patient age.

Authors:  H Yu; E P Diamandis; D J Sutherland
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.281

Review 9.  The clinical usefulness of prostate specific antigen: update 1994.

Authors:  A W Partin; J E Oesterling
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Tumourigenesis associated with the p53 tumour suppressor gene.

Authors:  F Chang; S Syrjänen; A Tervahauta; K Syrjänen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer: current and new predictors of metastasis.

Authors:  D F Hayes; C Isaacs; V Stearns
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of 2-methoxyestradiol alone or in combination with docetaxel in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Jehana James; Daryl J Murry; Anthony M Treston; Anna Maria Storniolo; George W Sledge; Carolyn Sidor; Kathy D Miller
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Integrative, In Silico and Comparative Analysis of Breast Cancer Secretome Highlights Invasive-Ductal-Carcinoma-Grade Progression Biomarkers.

Authors:  Stavroula L Kastora; Georgios Kounidas; Valerie Speirs; Yazan A Masannat
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 6.575

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.