OBJECTIVES:Ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) above the inflection point (P(inf)) has been shown to reduce lung injury by recruiting previously closed alveolar regions; however, it carries the risk of hyperinflating the lungs. The present study examined the hypothesis that a new strategy of recruiting the lung with a sustained inflation (SI), followed by ventilation with small tidal volumes, would allow the maintenance of low PEEP levels (<P(inf)) without inducing additional lung injury. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled ex vivo study. SETTING: An animal laboratory in a university setting. SUBJECTS:Isolated nonperfused lungs of adult Sprague-Dawley rats. INTERVENTIONS: We studied the effect on compliance and lung injury in four groups (n = 10 per group) of lavaged rat lungs. One group (group 1) served as a control; their lungs were inflated at PEEP < P(inf) but not ventilated. The other three groups were ventilated with small tidal volumes (5 to 6 mL/kg) for 2 hrs with the following interventions: group 2, PEEP < P(inf) without SI; group 3, PEEP < P(inf) after a SI to 30 cm H2O for 30 secs; and group 4, PEEP > P(inf). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In groups 2 and 4, static compliance decreased after ventilation (p < .01). Histologically, group 2 (PEEP < P(inf) without SI) showed significantly greater injury of small airways, but not of terminal respiratory units, compared with group 1. Group 3 (PEEP < P(inf) after a SI), but not group 4, showed significantly less injury of small airways and terminal respiratory units compared with group 2. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that small tidal volume ventilation after a recruitment maneuver allows ventilation on the deflation limb of the pressure/volume curve of the lungs at a PEEP < P(inf). This strategy a) minimizes lung injury as well as, or better than, use of PEEP > P(inf), and b) ensures a lower PEEP, which may minimize the detrimental consequences of high lung volume ventilation.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) above the inflection point (P(inf)) has been shown to reduce lung injury by recruiting previously closed alveolar regions; however, it carries the risk of hyperinflating the lungs. The present study examined the hypothesis that a new strategy of recruiting the lung with a sustained inflation (SI), followed by ventilation with small tidal volumes, would allow the maintenance of low PEEP levels (<P(inf)) without inducing additional lung injury. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled ex vivo study. SETTING: An animal laboratory in a university setting. SUBJECTS: Isolated nonperfused lungs of adult Sprague-Dawley rats. INTERVENTIONS: We studied the effect on compliance and lung injury in four groups (n = 10 per group) of lavaged rat lungs. One group (group 1) served as a control; their lungs were inflated at PEEP < P(inf) but not ventilated. The other three groups were ventilated with small tidal volumes (5 to 6 mL/kg) for 2 hrs with the following interventions: group 2, PEEP < P(inf) without SI; group 3, PEEP < P(inf) after a SI to 30 cm H2O for 30 secs; and group 4, PEEP > P(inf). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In groups 2 and 4, static compliance decreased after ventilation (p < .01). Histologically, group 2 (PEEP < P(inf) without SI) showed significantly greater injury of small airways, but not of terminal respiratory units, compared with group 1. Group 3 (PEEP < P(inf) after a SI), but not group 4, showed significantly less injury of small airways and terminal respiratory units compared with group 2. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that small tidal volume ventilation after a recruitment maneuver allows ventilation on the deflation limb of the pressure/volume curve of the lungs at a PEEP < P(inf). This strategy a) minimizes lung injury as well as, or better than, use of PEEP > P(inf), and b) ensures a lower PEEP, which may minimize the detrimental consequences of high lung volume ventilation.
Authors: Frederique Bayle; Claude Guerin; Jean-Paul Viale; Jean-Christophe Richard; Guy Annat Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-09-10 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Hajo Reissmann; Stephan H Böhm; Fernando Suárez-Sipmann; Gerardo Tusman; Claas Buschmann; Stefan Maisch; Tanja Pesch; Oliver Thamm; Christoph Plümers; Jochen Schulte am Esch; Göran Hedenstierna Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-02-03 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Anastasia Pellicano; David G Tingay; John F Mills; Stephen Fasulakis; Colin J Morley; Peter A Dargaville Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 17.440