OBJECT: The authors summarize their experience with stent deployment in the treatment of vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) insufficiency. This is an underdiagnosed condition, and the incidence of significant vertebral artery (VA) stenosis has been underappreciated. Medical therapy has been the mainstay of treatment because of the high rate of morbidity associated with surgical correction of VA stenosis. Recently, some authors have reported acceptable results with the use of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, but this technique has significant weaknesses such as elastic recoil and problems in achieving safe treatment of dissections. METHODS: The authors investigated the feasibility, safety, and outcome of VA stent placement in 50 patients in whom 55 vessels were treated using stents. Technical success was achieved in 54 (98%) of 55 vessels, with no procedure-related complications. However, one patient (2%) died of nonneurological causes, and one (2%) suffered a stroke that occurred within the 30-day postprocedural period and was related to a complicated coronary intervention. Clinical follow-up review performed at a mean of 25 +/- 10 months revealed two patients (4%) with recurrence of VBA symptoms. Six-month angiographic follow up was completed in 90% of eligible patients, with a 10% incidence of restenosis as defined by greater than 50% luminal narrowing. CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral artery stent placement is feasible in patients who have significant VA stenosis, with predictably good angiographically demonstrated and clinical results. The 6-month angiographically confirmed restenosis rate appears to be low, as does the clinical recurrence rate. This technique solves the problems of elastic recoil and the treatment of angioplasty-induced dissections. Further prospective comparison with medical preventive strategies is warranted.
OBJECT: The authors summarize their experience with stent deployment in the treatment of vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) insufficiency. This is an underdiagnosed condition, and the incidence of significant vertebral artery (VA) stenosis has been underappreciated. Medical therapy has been the mainstay of treatment because of the high rate of morbidity associated with surgical correction of VA stenosis. Recently, some authors have reported acceptable results with the use of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, but this technique has significant weaknesses such as elastic recoil and problems in achieving safe treatment of dissections. METHODS: The authors investigated the feasibility, safety, and outcome of VA stent placement in 50 patients in whom 55 vessels were treated using stents. Technical success was achieved in 54 (98%) of 55 vessels, with no procedure-related complications. However, one patient (2%) died of nonneurological causes, and one (2%) suffered a stroke that occurred within the 30-day postprocedural period and was related to a complicated coronary intervention. Clinical follow-up review performed at a mean of 25 +/- 10 months revealed two patients (4%) with recurrence of VBA symptoms. Six-month angiographic follow up was completed in 90% of eligible patients, with a 10% incidence of restenosis as defined by greater than 50% luminal narrowing. CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral artery stent placement is feasible in patients who have significant VA stenosis, with predictably good angiographically demonstrated and clinical results. The 6-month angiographically confirmed restenosis rate appears to be low, as does the clinical recurrence rate. This technique solves the problems of elastic recoil and the treatment of angioplasty-induced dissections. Further prospective comparison with medical preventive strategies is warranted.
Authors: H J Jaeger; K D Mathias; R Drescher; E Hauth; G Bockisch; E Demirel; H M Gissler Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Alexander V. Khaw; H. Christian Schumacher; Philip M. Meyers; Rishi Gupta; Randall T. Higashida Journal: Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med Date: 2004-06
Authors: A I Qureshi; J F Kirmani; P Harris-Lane; A A Divani; S Ahmed; A Ebrihimi; A Al Kawi; N Janjua Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Doris D M Lin; Philippe Gailloud; Norman J Beauchamp; Eric M Aldrich; Robert J Wityk; Kieran J Murphy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.825