Literature DB >> 10507264

Comparison of emergency room asthma care to National Guidelines.

C J Milks1, J J Oppenheimer, L Bielory.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines were first released in 1991. To date there have been no studies published comparing them with actual care given.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the documented care given in the emergency room (ER) of an urban tertiary care hospital with 1991 NAEPP guidelines.
METHODS: A total of 1858 urban emergency room records with a diagnosis of asthma or reactive airway disease were recovered in 1 year (9/95 to 8/96) from pediatric and adult patients seen in the ER. Ten percent (n = 181) of the charts were reviewed for documentation of history, assessment of severity of attack, treatment given, and disposition.
RESULTS: History of present attack was documented consistently in all age groups. Nocturnal symptoms were noted in 11%, and frequency of beta agonist use in 38% of the charts. Previous ER visits, hospitalization, ICU admissions, and intubations (HCUM) were documented in 70%. Accessory muscle use was recorded in 76% of the infants and 21% of the adults. Peak flows were obtained in 31% of children and 64% of adults. Steroids were given in the ER in 59% of infants, 83% of children, and 49% of adults. Pediatric patients were referred to their primary care provider 90%, and to pulmonary or allergy clinic 4% of the time. Adults were referred to allergists or pulmonologists 32% of the time.
CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in ER evaluation and treatment when compared with the 1991 NAEPP guidelines. Differences also exist between various age groups within the same institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10507264     DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62641-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  5 in total

Review 1.  Multi-colored simplified asthma guideline reminder: why pragmatic asthma tools are needed in real-world practice.

Authors:  Stanislaus Ting
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.667

2.  Effect of a clinical pathway on the hospitalisation rates of children with asthma: a prospective study.

Authors:  S P Norton; M V Pusic; F Taha; S Heathcote; B C Carleton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Multicenter analysis of quality indicators for children treated in the emergency department for asthma.

Authors:  Marion R Sills; Adit A Ginde; Sunday Clark; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Accident and emergency departments are still failing to assess asthma severity.

Authors:  S Harvey; L Forbes; D Jarvis; J Price; P Burney
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Adherence to guidelines and protocols in the prehospital and emergency care setting: a systematic review.

Authors:  Remco H A Ebben; Lilian C M Vloet; Michael H J Verhofstad; Sanne Meijer; Joke A J Mintjes-de Groot; Theo van Achterberg
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.