B H Kushner1, K Kramer, N K Cheung. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA. kusherb@mskcc.org
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the efficacy of oral etoposide against resistant stage 4 neuroblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory or recurrent stage 4 neuroblastoma were treated with etoposide 50 mg/m(2) taken orally each day, in two or three divided doses, for 21 consecutive days. Treatment could be repeated after a 1-week period. Extent-of-disease studies included imaging with 131-iodine-metaiodobenzylguanidine and extensive bone marrow (BM) sampling. RESULTS: Oral etoposide was used in 20 children between the ages of 2 and 11 years (median, 6 years). Prior treatment included high doses of alkylating agents and a median of 4.5 cycles of etoposide-containing chemotherapy, with cumulative etoposide doses of 1,800 mg/m(2) to 3,935 mg/m(2) (median, 2,300 mg/m(2)). Oral etoposide produced antineuroblastoma effects in four of four children with disease refractory to intensive induction treatment; sampling variability could account for resolution (n = 3) or reduction (n = 1) of BM involvement, but improvement in other markers also occurred. Antineuroblastoma effects were also evident in five of five children with asymptomatic relapses after a long chemotherapy-free interval: BM disease resolved and all other disease markers significantly improved in two patients, and disease markers improved or stabilized in three patients on treatment for more than 6 months. In these nine patients, extramedullary toxicity was absent, neutropenia did not occur, transfusional support was not needed, and preliminary data suggested little immunosuppression (phytohemagglutinin responses). Oral etoposide was ineffective in all (11 of 11) patients with rapidly growing tumor masses. CONCLUSION: Given the absence of toxicity to major organs, the minimal myelosuppression or immunosuppression, and the antineoplastic activity in patients with low tumor burdens after high-dose chemotherapy, limited use of low-dose oral etoposide should be considered for inclusion in postinduction consolidative treatment programs aimed at eradicating minimal residual disease.
PURPOSE: To describe the efficacy of oral etoposide against resistant stage 4 neuroblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory or recurrent stage 4 neuroblastoma were treated with etoposide 50 mg/m(2) taken orally each day, in two or three divided doses, for 21 consecutive days. Treatment could be repeated after a 1-week period. Extent-of-disease studies included imaging with 131-iodine-metaiodobenzylguanidine and extensive bone marrow (BM) sampling. RESULTS: Oral etoposide was used in 20 children between the ages of 2 and 11 years (median, 6 years). Prior treatment included high doses of alkylating agents and a median of 4.5 cycles of etoposide-containing chemotherapy, with cumulative etoposide doses of 1,800 mg/m(2) to 3,935 mg/m(2) (median, 2,300 mg/m(2)). Oral etoposide produced antineuroblastoma effects in four of four children with disease refractory to intensive induction treatment; sampling variability could account for resolution (n = 3) or reduction (n = 1) of BM involvement, but improvement in other markers also occurred. Antineuroblastoma effects were also evident in five of five children with asymptomatic relapses after a long chemotherapy-free interval: BM disease resolved and all other disease markers significantly improved in two patients, and disease markers improved or stabilized in three patients on treatment for more than 6 months. In these nine patients, extramedullary toxicity was absent, neutropenia did not occur, transfusional support was not needed, and preliminary data suggested little immunosuppression (phytohemagglutinin responses). Oral etoposide was ineffective in all (11 of 11) patients with rapidly growing tumor masses. CONCLUSION: Given the absence of toxicity to major organs, the minimal myelosuppression or immunosuppression, and the antineoplastic activity in patients with low tumor burdens after high-dose chemotherapy, limited use of low-dose oral etoposide should be considered for inclusion in postinduction consolidative treatment programs aimed at eradicating minimal residual disease.
Authors: Brian H Kushner; Kim Kramer; Shakeel Modak; Li-Xuan Qin; Karima Yataghena; Suresh C Jhanwar; Nai-Kong V Cheung Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Giselle L Saulnier Sholler; Eugene W Gerner; Genevieve Bergendahl; Robert B MacArthur; Alyssa VanderWerff; Takamaru Ashikaga; Jeffrey P Bond; William Ferguson; William Roberts; Randal K Wada; Don Eslin; Jacqueline M Kraveka; Joel Kaplan; Deanna Mitchell; Nehal S Parikh; Kathleen Neville; Leonard Sender; Timothy Higgins; Masao Kawakita; Kyoko Hiramatsu; Shun-Suke Moriya; André S Bachmann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nehal S Parikh; Scott C Howard; Guillermo Chantada; Trijn Israels; Mohammed Khattab; Patricia Alcasabas; Catherine G Lam; Lawrence Faulkner; Julie R Park; Wendy B London; Katherine K Matthay Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-03-21 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Tyler Maser; Maria Rich; David Hayes; Ping Zhao; Abhinav B Nagulapally; Jeffrey Bond; Giselle Saulnier Sholler Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Adriana Rosé; Nicolas André; Viviana R Rozados; Leandro E Mainetti; Mauricio Menacho Márquez; María José Rico; Paula Schaiquevich; Milena Villarroel; Lauro Gregianin; Jaume Mora Graupera; Wendy Gómez García; Sidnei Epelman; Carlos Alasino; Daniel Alonso; Guillermo Chantada; O Graciela Scharovsky Journal: Ecancermedicalscience Date: 2016-09-06