Literature DB >> 10506610

Results of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Early Clinical Studies Group phase II trial of first-line irinotecan in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

C Lhommé1, P Fumoleau, P Fargeot, Y Krakowski, V Dieras, J Chauvergne, P Vennin, P Rebattu, H Roche, J L Misset, M A Lentz, M Van Glabbeke, A Matthieu-Boué, D Mignard, B Chevallier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of irinotecan (CPT-11) in advanced or recurrent cervical carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed, inoperable, progressive, metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cervical carcinoma and had received no radiotherapy in the preceding 3 months and had never received chemotherapy. The initial irinotecan dosage of 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks was modifiable according to toxicity. Treatment continued for six cycles after complete response, or until disease progression or excessive toxicity after partial response, or for three additional cycles in the case of stable disease. Patients were stratified into group A (>/= one measurable lesion in a previously unirradiated area, with or without progressive disease in irradiated fields) or group B (measurable new lesion[s] in an irradiated field).
RESULTS: Fifty-one of 55 enrolled patients were eligible for inclusion (median age, 47 years; range, 30 to 71 years). The response rate was 15.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0% to 28.6%) overall, 23.5% (95% CI, 10.7% to 41.2%) for group A (complete response, 2.9%), and zero for group B. The median time to progression and median survival were 4.0 and 8.2 months for group A and 2.5 and 4.2 months for group B, respectively. The major grade 3/4 toxicities for groups A and B were diarrhea (24.3% and 55.5%, respectively) and neutropenia (24.3% and 33.3%, respectively). There were four toxicity-related deaths, three in group B. Patients with no prior external pelvic irradiation experienced fewer grade 3 and 4 adverse events.
CONCLUSION: Irinotecan is effective in treating cervical squamous cell carcinoma if disease is located in an unirradiated area. Because of toxicity, a reduced dose is advised for patients previously treated with external pelvic irradiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10506610     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  12 in total

1.  Irinotecan plus cisplatin combination against metastatic gastric cancer: phase II study.

Authors:  Mustafa Altinbas; Ozlem Er; Metin Ozkan; Yusuf Solak; H Senol Coskun; Can Kucuk; Sebnem Gursoy
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Phase II clinical trial of capecitabine in the treatment of advanced, persistent or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with translational research: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  Agustin A Garcia; John A Blessing; Kathleen M Darcy; Heinz Josef Lenz; Wu Zhang; Ed Hannigan; David H Moore
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Pretreatment platelet-lymphocyte ratio is an independent predictor of cervical cancer recurrence following concurrent chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Keiichiro Nakamura; Takeshi Nishida; Tomoko Haruma; Junko Haraga; Chiaki Omichi; Chikako Ogawa; Tomoyuki Kusumoto; Noriko Seki; Hisashi Masuyama; Yuji Hiramatsu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-01

Review 4.  Pharmacotherapy options for locally advanced and advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Alfonso Dueñas-González; Lucely Cetina; Jaime Coronel; Déborah Martínez-Baños
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Predictors of Hematologic Toxicity and Chemotherapy Dose Intensity in Patients Undergoing Chemoradiation for Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Talha Shaikh; Lora S Wang; Brian Egleston; Meher Burki; John P Hoffman; Steven J Cohen; Joshua E Meyer
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.339

6.  Treatment options in recurrent cervical cancer (Review).

Authors:  Angiolo Gadducci; Roberta Tana; Stefania Cosio; Luca Cionini
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Joseph K Salama; John C Roeske; Neil Mehta; Arno J Mundt
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2004-04

Review 8.  Taxanes: their impact on gynecologic malignancy.

Authors:  Carlton L Schwab; Diana P English; Dana M Roque; Alessandro D Santin
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.248

9.  Radiosensitizers in cervical cancer. Cisplatin and beyond.

Authors:  Myrna Candelaria; Alicia Garcia-Arias; Lucely Cetina; Alfonso Dueñas-Gonzalez
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Association between bone marrow dosimetric parameters and acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy: comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Beina Hui; Yingbing Zhang; Fan Shi; Juan Wang; Tao Wang; Jiquan Wang; Wei Yuan; Yi Li; Zi Liu
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.