Literature DB >> 10505043

Scheduling of gemcitabine and cisplatin in Lewis lung tumour bearing mice.

C J van Moorsel1, H M Pinedo, G Veerman, J B Vermorken, P E Postmus, G J Peters.   

Abstract

We used the gemcitabine (dFdC) and cisplatin (cis-diamine dichloroplatinum CDDP) resistant murine NSCLC tumour Lewis Lung (LL) in C57/B16 mice to optimise scheduling of both drugs, since in previous in vivo studies no effective combination schedule of both compounds was found to overcome resistance to either drug. dFdC could not be combined at the previously determined maximum tolerated dose (MTD) (120 mg/kg, q3dx4) with CDDP at its MTD (9 mg/kg, q6dx2) (mean weight loss < 15% and < 15% toxic deaths), because of additive toxicity. Therefore, we lowered the dose of dFdC to 60 mg/kg (q3dx4) and of CDDP to 3 mg/kg (q6dx2), which caused an increase in antitumour effect compared with the activity of each compound alone at its MTD (growth delay factor (GDF) = 0.55, 0.13 and 2.56 for dFdC and CDDP alone and the combination, respectively). Changing the CDDP treatment schedule giving the total dose (6 mg/kg) only at day 0 caused unacceptable toxicity. This effect was not seen when mice were treated with the total dose of CDDP on day 9, but, the anti-tumour effect was not enhanced. To decrease toxicity, the dosage of dFdC was lowered to 50 mg/kg and combined with the total dose of CDDP on day 0, which caused a better antitumour effect than the combination of 60 mg/kg dFdC and 3 mg/kg CDDP (q6dx2) with acceptable toxicity. Schedule dependency was found for the combination: dFdC preceding CDDP by 4 h was the best treatment schedule in the LL tumours (GDF: 2.1) with acceptable toxicity. However, when the interval was increased to 24 h, toxicity became unacceptable (> 30% weight loss). The reverse schedule, in which CDDP preceded dFdC, did not lead to an increased antitumour effect or to increased toxicity. Adding amifostine, a selective chemoprotector, to the treatment decreased toxicity of the combination without affecting the antitumour effect. Increasing the CDDP dose to 9 mg/kg (day 0) under amifostine protection led to an improved therapeutic index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10505043     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00004-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  17 in total

1.  Cisplatin inhibition of anthrax lethal toxin.

Authors:  Mahtab Moayeri; Jason F Wiggins; Robin E Lindeman; Stephen H Leppla
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Development of a green fluorescent protein metastatic-cancer chick-embryo drug-screen model.

Authors:  Vladimir Bobek; Jiri Plachy; Daniela Pinterova; Katarina Kolostova; Michael Boubelik; Ping Jiang; Meng Yang; Robert M Hoffman
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Efficient inhibition of lung cancer in murine model by plasmid-encoding VEGF short hairpin RNA in combination with low-dose DDP.

Authors:  Yong P Ma; Yang Yang; Shuang Zhang; Xiang Chen; Na Zhang; Wei Wang; Zhi X Cao; Yu Jiang; Xia Zhao; Yu Q Wei; Hong X Deng
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-25

4.  A Polymeric Nanogel-Based Treatment Regimen for Enhanced Efficacy and Sequential Administration of Synergistic Drug Combination in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Kruti S Soni; Divya Thomas; Thomas Caffrey; Kamiya Mehla; Fan Lei; Kelly A O'Connell; Satish Sagar; Subodh M Lele; Michael A Hollingsworth; Prakash Radhakrishnan; Tatiana K Bronich
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  Peripheral neuropathy due to therapy with paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  C C P Verstappen; T J Postma; K Hoekman; J J Heimans
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Prevention of lung cancer recurrence using cisplatin-loaded superhydrophobic nanofiber meshes.

Authors:  Jonah A Kaplan; Rong Liu; Jonathan D Freedman; Robert Padera; John Schwartz; Yolonda L Colson; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Preclinical relevance of dosing time for the therapeutic index of gemcitabine-cisplatin.

Authors:  X M Li; K Tanaka; J Sun; E Filipski; L Kayitalire; C Focan; F Lévi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Inhibitory effect of ginsenoside Rg3 combined with gemcitabine on angiogenesis and growth of lung cancer in mice.

Authors:  Tai-Guo Liu; Ying Huang; Dan-Dan Cui; Xiao-Bing Huang; Shu-Hua Mao; Ling-Ling Ji; Hai-Bo Song; Cheng Yi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Correction of anaemia through the use of darbepoetin alfa improves chemotherapeutic outcome in a murine model of Lewis lung carcinoma.

Authors:  A M Shannon; D J Bouchier-Hayes; C M Condron; D Toomey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Antitumor efficacy of combination of interferon-gamma-inducible protein 10 gene with gemcitabine, a study in murine model.

Authors:  Kai Mei; Lian Wang; Ling Tian; Jingrui Yu; Zhixuan Zhang; Yuquan Wei
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.