Literature DB >> 10504316

Modelling the locomotor energetics of extinct hominids.

P A Kramer1.   

Abstract

Bipedality is the defining characteristic of Hominidae and, as such, an understanding of the adaptive significance and functional implications of bipedality is imperative to any study of human evolution. Hominid bipedality is, presumably, a solution to some problem for the early hominids, one that has much to do with energy expenditure. Until recently, however, little attention could be focused on the quantifiable energetic aspects of bipedality as a unique locomotor form within Primates because of the inability to measure empirically the energy expenditure of non-modern hominids. A recently published method provides a way of circumventing the empirical measurement dilemma by calculating energy expenditure directly from anatomical variables and movement profiles. Although the origins of bipedality remain clouded, two discernible forms of locomotor anatomy are present in the hominid fossil record: the australopithecine and modern configurations. The australopithecine form is best represented by AL 288-1, a partial skeleton of Australopithecus afarensis, and is characterized as having short legs and a wide pelvis. The modern form is represented by modern humans and has long legs and a narrow pelvis. Human walking is optimized to take advantage of the changing levels of potential and kinetic energy that occur as the body and limbs move through the stride cycle. Although this optimization minimizes energy expenditure, some energy is required to maintain motion. I quantify this energy by developing a dynamic model that uses kinematic equations to determine energy expenditure. By representing both configurations with such a model, I can compare their rates of energy expenditure. I find that the australopithecine configuration uses less energy than that of a modern human. Despite arguments presented in the anthropological literature, the shortness of the legs of AL 288-1 provides no evidence that she was burdened with a compromised or transitional locomotor anatomy. Instead, she may well have been an effective biped at walking speeds, not despite her short legs, but rather because of them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10504316     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.202.20.2807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  19 in total

Review 1.  Arboreality, terrestriality and bipedalism.

Authors:  Robin Huw Crompton; William I Sellers; Susannah K S Thorpe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Phylogeny of early Australopithecus: new fossil evidence from the Woranso-Mille (central Afar, Ethiopia).

Authors:  Yohannes Haile-Selassie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The musculoskeletal system of humans is not tuned to maximize the economy of locomotion.

Authors:  David R Carrier; Christoph Anders; Nadja Schilling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Stride lengths, speed and energy costs in walking of Australopithecus afarensis: using evolutionary robotics to predict locomotion of early human ancestors.

Authors:  William I Sellers; Gemma M Cain; Weijie Wang; Robin H Crompton
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Electromyography activity across gait and incline: The impact of muscular activity on human morphology.

Authors:  Cara M Wall-Scheffler; Elizabeth Chumanov; Karen Steudel-Numbers; Bryan Heiderscheit
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  Muscle moment arms of the gibbon hind limb: implications for hylobatid locomotion.

Authors:  Anthony J Channon; Robin H Crompton; Michael M Günther; Evie E Vereecke
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Pelvic Breadth and Locomotor Kinematics in Human Evolution.

Authors:  Laura Tobias Gruss; Richard Gruss; Daniel Schmitt
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 8.  Locomotion and posture from the common hominoid ancestor to fully modern hominins, with special reference to the last common panin/hominin ancestor.

Authors:  R H Crompton; E E Vereecke; S K S Thorpe
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 9.  Evaluating alternative gait strategies using evolutionary robotics.

Authors:  William I Sellers; Louise A Dennis; Wang W -J; Robin H Crompton
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Morphometrics and inertial properties in the body segments of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Kirsten Schoonaert; Kristiaan D'Août; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.